Adam Lang's Blog
Adam Lang's Blog
The New Commonwealth
send to a friend | print | comment
Redistricting double-take
We’ve all had the experience. We are thumbing threw a magazine, reading a Web page we just opened or listening to the TV and all of a sudden you just sort of stop and utter, “they said what?”
That was the reaction I had when I saw an interview on Campaigns and Elections with two people from GOPAC, Frank Donatelli and David Avella. The question was about Republicans gaining control of states and it affecting redistricting.
Avella said the following: “Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Indiana and Texas. If Republicans were just given fair district, not gerrymandered snake-districts, we can be competitive. We don’t have to do what the Democrats have traditionally done.”
I am not disputing his point about Pennsylvania having a lot of gerrymandered districts—it does and is ranked 2nd worst in the country on this count. What created the “he said what?” moment is that the Republicans controlled Harrisburg and drew the districts 10 years ago!
As much as it would be interesting to pursue the history and results of that drawing further, ultimately it wouldn’t solve anything. Instead, we’ll take another teachable moment and discuss something that is vital and unfortunately has had very little coverage in the election cycle—redistricting.
About two years ago state Representative Babette Josephs (D-Philadelphia) dropped the ball on getting legislation put up to reform how Pennsylvania handles redistricting. It required a Constitutional amendment and the deadline to get the procedure started in time for the upcoming census came and went while legislation languished in her State Government Committee, which she chairs (and jokingly referred to as “the place where reform goes to die”).
At that point everything seemed to come to a halt. It seems government can only legislate when under a deadline and forced to rush a sloppy product. Instead of fixing up the legislation and passing it for the 2020 census, nothing was done.
So now we are about a year away from having another gerrymandered state and no one is talking about the problems or the solutions. This should be discussed by our gubernatorial candidates and it should be discussed by our General Assembly candidates. We need to know how they are going to influence redistricting for this cycle and what they are going to do to fix it for the next cycle.
September 21, 2010 at 10:04 am













Adam Lang
Sep 21st, 2010
Apologies for not catching “threw/through”. I just noticed it.
BLB
Sep 21st, 2010
The Republicans carved up the 18th district specifically to help a Republican win in 2002. Tim Murphy has held onto that seat for four terms with no serious challenge by a Democrat. That re-redistricting also forced two popular Democratic incumbents, Frank Mascara and John Murtha, to fight over the gerrymandered 12th. Ever wonder what a gerrymandered district looks like? Just take a gander at the 12th, which looks like a bulldog biting the foot of a kangaroo.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/66/PACongressionalDistrict12.png
flynnbw
Sep 21st, 2010
Hahah, that is funny. Republicans trying to claim that it was a Democratic gerrymander that produced the current majority Democratic delegation.
Imagine how bad it would be if it had been a fair fight the last two election cycles!
Also BLB, add Jim Gerlach in the 6th District to the list of Republicans only in office due to the creative map-drawing of Republican state legislators nine years ago.
bill healy
Sep 22nd, 2010
Put the 7th in that list too.
TB
Sep 23rd, 2010
First guy I would screw is Joe Pitts in PA-16. Hasn’t been in a horse race since he won the GOP primary for the seat in 1996. If Pitts unknowingly had to run in a competitive district a young go getter could sneak up on him under the radar, hit full stride by Labor Day. Pitts would be forced to hit the campaign trail hard for the first time in over a decade causing the old goat’s health to deteriorate quickly. One thing no Democrat running in that district has ever considered is that Joe Pitts is an ardent supporter of wars. His Amish constituents are none to enthused about war and most assuredly could be persuaded that Joe Pitts is a war mongering old goat. Which he most assuredly is. He bit on the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War hook line and sinker when George W. Bush threw him the bait.
Tony Heyl
Sep 25th, 2010
I agree, the redistricting process is awful in Pennsylvania. Redistricting shouldn’t favor whatever party is in power. Other states, but not all, use independent commissions to set up their redistricting and it is much fairer. To have it become as politically driven as it is in PA does a disservice to voters and democracy.