send to a friend | print | comment
An economy-based Power Rankings reshuffle
Less than 50 days before voters go to the polls, economic indicators increasingly point to a recover that is, at best, progressing much too slowly. The economic headlines of recent weeks mean that voters’ perceptions of the economy have likely been cemented, with little time left for Democrats to change the political narrative at a national level.
That means Democrats have steeper hills to climb in localizing races against the national political climate. And with that in mind, we offer up a mid-September reassessment of the pa2010.com Congressional Power Rankings, Pennsylvania’s most comprehensive, richly reported political forecast.
The open seat in the 7th District remains the state’s most competitive race, still followed by imperiled incumbents Paul Kanjorski and Kathy Dahlkemper in the 11th and 3rd Districts, respectively. But after that, we’ve shaken things up.
The Democratic Party’s two viable House challengers have each found their races moved down a couple slots—a change that has little to do with their own campaigns and much more to do with the national climate they are running against. The 6th District, where Democrat Manan Trivedi is challenging incumbent Republican Jim Gerlach, changes from No. 4 to No. 6. Similarly, the 15th District, where Democrat John Callahan is taking on incumbent Republican Charlie Dent, moves from No. 5 to No. 7.
That means some Democratic-held seats have become more competitive, most notably Patrick Murphy’s 8th District, which now sits at No. 4 on the rankings. Republican challenger Mike Fitzpatrick’s strong fundraising, an anti-Democratic climate and polling data we’ve seen all contributed to this change. Political forecasters increasingly see the Bucks County race as a battleground. No race has become more competitive since we inaugurated the Power Rankings—it’s moved from No. 10 all the way to No. 4.
Another GOP challenger whose fortunes seem to have improved is Tom Marino. His challenge against incumbent Democrat Chris Carney has been moved from No. 10 to No. 5. Despite Carney’s massive financial advantage and Marino’s less-than-disciplined candidacy, we’re increasingly seeing a political climate hostile to Carney’s vote in favor of health care.
There is less change near the bottom of the 10 races we consider to be in play. Tim Holden’s 17th District has moved down to No. 10, after his Republican challenger has struggled to raise money. The incumbent protected himself by voting against health care reform, as did Jason Altmire in the 4th District, which is currently No. 9. The rematch in the 12th District remains put at No. 8.
CHECK OUT THE NEW POWER RANKINGS

September 13, 2010 at 11:01 am













We Return to Better Political News… | Snowflakes in Hell
Sep 13th, 2010
[...] there’s this bit of interesting news from one of my favorite local political news sites: That means some Democratic-held seats have [...]
David Diano
Sep 13th, 2010
The SAFE seats of Brady, Fattah, and Schwartz in Philly spell the doom of Sestak’s hope (eggs in on basket plan) for massive voter turnout in the city to overcome the rest of the state.
Candidates with an easy win aren’t going to spend the election busting their asses of GOTV. Brady doesn’t even have an opponent. Philly politics this cycle is about setting up the board for the 2011 council races.
Philadelphia Dem turnout for the primary was 24%, but statewide turnout was 27%. In Brady’s 1st district, turnout was only 21%. This is below the average for Philly and well below the state average for Dems.
Marino moves up | The David Madeira Show
Sep 14th, 2010
[...] Tom Marino achieves "most improved" status of the Congressional Challengers this week in PA2010's power rankings. [...]
Change in 2010
Sep 14th, 2010
Based on Sunday’s (taped) debate performance, Fitzpatrick’s campaign is going to gain momentum. Murphy doesn’t have anything of substance to run on since he has decided to run away from his stimulus, cap & trade and Obamacare votes. He sold out his district for personal gain among his party’s leaders. What he failed to see was that his party’s leaders are leading his party to disaster – quite an accomplishment when you think about the momentum they blew from 2008.
Fitzpatrick’s focus on jobs, fiscal responsibility and smaller government will carry the day. His “Fire Nancy Pelosi” message resonates, given Pelosi’s 10% or so approval rating. All Murphy has left is negative advertising, and that is going to make him look really desperate.