The Washington Post

pa2012.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it

AD WATCH: Sestak’s Navy bio vs. a questionable lobbyist claim

AD WATCH: Sestak’s Navy bio vs. a questionable lobbyist claim

In two recent TV ads, Democratic Senate candidate Joe Sestak’s campaign has tried to frame the race as a choice between a dedicated public servant who made his life in the Navy (Sestak) and a Wall Street sympathizer who has the financial sector’s interests at heart (Republican Pat Toomey).

A 30-second spot recapping Sestak’s military history makes no disputed factual claims, and we therefore give it a score of FAIR GAME. But another ad that makes reference to Toomey’s past errs on at least one significant count, so we find it to be only HALF TRUE.

[Click here to read more about our AD WATCH fact-checking series and the different scores.]

As to the purely biographical ad, Sestak was indeed a three-star Navy Admiral; he was indeed the director of defense policy for the National Security Council in the Clinton administration; he did command an aircraft carrier battle group; and he did buck his party by staying in the Senate primary against Arlen Specter when the White House and others sought to push him aside.

The contrast commercial is more complicated. In it, a narrator opens:

Pat Toomey: a trader on Wall Street who went to Congress and voted for Wall Street, then got rich as Wall Street’s top lobbyist.

Toomey was indeed a currency derivatives trader in the industry. In Congress, he supported measures to deregulate the industry. Whether he “voted for Wall Street” is up for debate, but it falls within the realm of political rhetoric that is fair game here.

But the claim he was “Wall Street’s top lobbyist” is misleading at best, if not outright false. The claim refers to the time Toomey spent running the conservative Club for Growth, an industry-funded group that advocates low taxes and limited government while also supporting conservative primary challengers against more moderate Republicans.

In heading the Club for Growth, Toomey was indeed compensated handsomely. But as other news organizations have noted recently, he has never been registered as a lobbyist. Sestak’s campaign has argued that it’s fair to call him a lobbyist because he was indeed advocating for certain policies, and was surely in the business of political influence. Even if one accepts that, calling a man who was never registered as a lobbyist “Wall Street’s top lobbyist” is stretch.

See both ads below.

share001btn AD WATCH: Sestaks Navy bio vs. a questionable lobbyist claim

September 27, 2010 at 1:28 pm

--pa2010.com Staff

Tags: , ,

comments

comments [4] | post a comment

  1. David Diano

    Sep 27th, 2010

    There is one other “factual” note in Sestak’s ad.

    Joe removed the word “Democrat” from “Joe Sestak Democrat for Senate”.

    That’s more “truth in advertising” than we got during the Primary.

  2. Matt M.

    Sep 27th, 2010

    Sestak’s accomplishments (or lack thereof) for his district are far more relevant to his qualifications to serve as a senator than his stint in the Navy. From which he was FIRED.

    Toomey has Sestak beat on pure legislative credentials.

    Good catch, Diano. An interesting, but not surprising, little observation of Sestak the chameleon changing his colors to suit the moment.

  3. David Diano

    Sep 27th, 2010

    Matt-
    During the Primary, he made a big f—ing deal about he was the one needed to “lead” the party by being at the top ticket.

    lead astray
    lead off a cliff
    lead into harm’s way

    Joe’s not about leadership, but about leadershipwreck

    Check out this article about how Sestak has refused to support the coordinated campaign and is deliberately screwing the party and rest of the ticket:

    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10269/1090492-178.stm

    In June, when the state party was electing a new chairman, Sestak tried to throw his weight around with the threat that he wouldn’t support the party if he didn’t get his pick for chairman. However, Sestak’s rep preceded him and everyone with a 3-digit IQ knew that Sestak wasn’t going to honor any promises to support the party regardless of who became chairman.

    Once Sestak costs the party the election, look for the backroom stories and Sestak’s duplicity to come out.

  4. Joe

    Sep 28th, 2010

    FYI, the Club for Growth is a member funded org, to which I and thousands of others contribute, not an ” industry-funded group”.

Leave a Reply


- will not be published