If any of Rohrer’s supporters have any intention of improving our state they will vote for Tom Corbett. A vote for Rohrer is in essence a vote for Onorato. If they want Rohrer as governor then in four or eight years get him on the ballot again. Dividing the GOP is not going to help anyone but the Democrats!

The idea that a third-party/write-in hurts Corbett is part of the same old logic that pundits have been wrong about for decades.

If folks are trying to launch a Rohrer write-in, could it be because they are unhappy with Corbett, and would never vote for him regardless? Do you really think that there are voters going to the poll undecided, that would vote for Corbett, who instead will decide at the last minute to write in some else? Silly.

Same goes with the talk of Perot costing Bush the 1992 election, or Nader costing Gore. Perot voters were unhappy with Bush, and Nader voters were unhappy with the Democrat party. They would not simply have vote for the Republican/Democrat (respectively).

get it! There are still signs all over Berks County. I hope they make a move. He should have a concert with POker Face.

Do these people realize they’re basically voting for Onorato? I mean come on.

I understand that there are times when a third party candidate is the only morally acceptable option, but what is it about Rohrer that draws such loyalty to an doomed unknown? He couldn’t raise enough cash to even get embarrassed by his defeat because there weren’t enough people to notice that he ran. I really am curious, what is it about him that makes him so attractive?

A vote for Corbett is a vote for the same old corrupt “good ol’ boy” political system currently operating under the name “PAGOP”. Rohrer supporters, keep your heads up. Corbett may be forced to withdraw from the race sometime this month. Then the GOP would be forced to choose a replacement candidate who should be the runner-up in the primary – Sam Rohrer. Of course, that would be the bitterest pill they would ever have to swallow because Rob Gleason cannot accept any kind of failure and he would do everything he could possibly think of to perform an end-run of the traditional political process so that a selection of Sam could be avoided. Like I say, same old corrupt “good ol’ boy” political system as practiced by the PAGOP.

Why would corbett be forced to resign? Besides the obvious conflict of interest with the ag position.

Kyle: If the Kimmett lawsuit and subsequent federal investigation blows up in Corbett’s face he may be forced to withdraw. There are some pretty serious charges involved.

DQM: If you truly want to know, take a look at some of Rohrer’s policy statements on YouTube. You’ll get the message.

John: The Rohrer loyalists understand that if Sam loses their vote has probably helped Onorato. But implicit in their vote for Sam is the understanding that they’re helping to send a message to Gleason, Asher, and the rest of the corrupt, self-serving Republican bosses that the voters are finished with empty suit candidates being forced down their throats. An Onorato administration may be painful in the short term but could lead to positive change for the PA GOP. The GOP’s Politburo-style politics must end.

Well stated Josh!!!!

When the GOP endorses a candidate before the primary it doesn’t pass the smell test. Corbett is a party YES man and therefor will not be much different than Dan, their both progressives.

Sam is for the people he wouldn’t be going along with the federal meltdown of the Constitution, he would exert States Rights. Something that hasn’t been done in a long time.

Do you all realize we have had Progressives in the white house since 1989. I believe it has been longer than that for the state. Pay close attention to the candidates, please, our future depends on it. I for one would like to know what it’s like to have Constitutional leadership country and state.