The Washington Post

pa2012.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it

Lentz camp goes hypocritical… to cry hypocrisy?

Lentz camp goes hypocritical… to cry hypocrisy?

A simple campaign press release had never made my jaw literally drop—until I saw what Democrat Bryan Lentz’s campaign laid on my table recently.

“Lentz Campaign Calls For Meehan to Try and Win Votes with Ideas, Not Courts,” the headline screamed.

This is, of course, a reference to the fact that Republican Pat Meehan’s campaign in the 7th Congressional District has spearheaded a ballot challenge against Jim Schneller, the conservative independent candidate who got on the ballot thanks to help from Lentz allies. The controversy has made the contentious race between Lentz and Meehan even more heated.

“It is a shame how difficult it is for someone who’s demonstrated a sincere interest in being part of the democratic process to actually be on the ballot,” Lentz campaign manager Kevin McTigue said in the release. “Pat Meehan and his cohorts should be ashamed at the efforts they are going to to knock someone off the ballot who’s actually willing to say what he believes.”

Now, if you’ve been closely following this race, there’s really only one reasonable reaction to this statement: Whaa??

This is coming from the same campaign that brought ballot challenges of its own against all three of its opponents in both parties earlier this year, successfully knocking both primary challengers out of the race and unsuccessfully taking Meehan’s campaign to court over petition fraud.

Put your party affiliations and ideology aside for a second: This, my friends, is what we call hypocrisy.

Incredulous, I called up the Lentz camp, thinking maybe it was a (very) late April Fool’s joke or something. What I found out was even more confusing.

It turns out that aforementioned quote from McTigue was uttered verbatim in 2006 by one Virginia Davis, who was then a spokeswoman for Senator Rick Santorum’s campaign and is now Meehan’s spokeswoman. At the time, Davis was commenting on the fact that Democrats were challenging Green Party candidate Carl Romanelli’s spot on the ballot. The Lentz campaign quickly sent over a fact sheet full of the things Davis said about the Romanelli challenge back then, documentation it apparently had at the ready for when we Fourth Estaters called.

So, if I understand this correctly, this was some cute attempt to the bait the Meehan people into some kind of hypocrisy trap, using us unsuspecting reporters as the fishing rod. If that’s the case, they lost me on this particular one, and also left me feeling just a bit jerked around in the process.

Look, I know traps like this are set up frequently. Usually, they’re not so confusing.

But let’s look at the merits.

By throwing Davis’ 2006 quotes back at Meehan, the Lentz camp is making things more difficult for itself. If you want to call hypocrisy on the Meehan campaign for challenging Schneller (a fair point to make), just note that the very same campaign earlier this year decried ballot challenges as a waste of taxpayer money. I actually did that for them in this story. If you want to make the point that getting third-party candidates on the ballot to split the other side’s vote is standard fare for both parties (a very valid point to make), just say so. I did that for them, too.

But saying that Virginia Davis in 2006 = Pat Meehan in 2010 doesn’t hold water. In the public sphere, political spokespeople don’t actually have their own views. They speak for the candidates they represent. I know plenty PR pros who have had to forcefully advocate policies with which they don’t personally agree. If we journalists started holding these folks accountable for contradictions that arise from representing different candidates, we’d never be able to get of LexisNexis to report actually news.

More than anything else, though, going after Meehan on this subject when you’ve challenged everyone yourself and quietly helped another guy get on the ballot just seems like unnecessary rhetorical jumping jacks, an exercise that leaves the subject hanging by a substantive thread.

Next time, I hope they just say whatever they want to say.

share001btn Lentz camp goes hypocritical... to cry hypocrisy?

August 27, 2010 at 11:00 am

--Dan Hirschhorn

Tags: , , ,

comments

comments [9] | post a comment

  1. sick of it all

    Aug 27th, 2010

    Dan-Well put. Lentz’s folks do make an excellent point wiht Romanelli though I do not think the means of bringing it to light was the most efficient or effective.
    If Lentz just sticks to issues and makes Meehan take positions, he will defeat Meehan, who is very shallow.

  2. Tony Soprano

    Aug 27th, 2010

    Cue lame David Diano Lentz-apology… NOW

  3. I wonder

    Aug 27th, 2010

    That’s the problem — Lentz can’t stick to positions because he’s wrong on all of them. He is for cap and tax, more government spending, pro tax increases, pro bailout, etc. He loses on every issue.

    That’s why his campaign has resorted to putting a third party spoiler on the ballot, playing cutesy with ballot challenges, and making up other bogus things that can’t stand the light of a fact check.

    His campaign seems to be falling apart at the seems.

  4. David Diano

    Aug 27th, 2010

    Dan-
    I agree that the Lentz campaign should just be more up front with how happy they would be to have Schneller on the ballot. They are pussyfooting around this issue (with emphasis on the first two syllables.

    Right now on Lentz’s campaign site, he’s challenging Meehan to show up and debate him at a townhall meeting. Schneller should be invited to the event as well. (And if I were he, I’d just show up anyway.)

    What would Meehan do if Lentz and Schneller debated without him and got headlines?

    As a matter of consistency, Lentz should treat Schneller as an equal to Meehan on the ballot, when it comes to debates (and empty ideas).

    Dan, keep up the good work and keep the campaigns honest when they try to spin you.

  5. debt to high

    Aug 27th, 2010

    Lentz = dirty politics and more taxes. I’ll vote and work for Meehan to get elected. Sick of Obama & Pelosi politics.

  6. David Diano

    Aug 27th, 2010

    debt to high
    Why do I think you are already working for Meehan?

  7. delco mod

    Aug 29th, 2010

    Why doesn’t Rep. Lentz just admit that in order to help in his election effort he advocated for his people to assist Schneller to gather signatures. If he’s in this to win it, this type of frankness would be understandable to both the right and left.

    I for one am tired of the political “dancing”.

    By continuously distancing himself from the issue, he comes off as being dishonest and sneaky. Man up and admit the truth. We all understand his reasoning.

    There seems to be a real disconnect in the advice Lentz political consultants are providing him.

  8. David Diano

    Aug 29th, 2010

    Delco mod-
    I agree. There’s nothing wrong with advocating to your supporters what they can do to help the campaign.

    I think the problem with Dem politicians in general is that they’ve gotten overly sensitive to the Right-wing spin machine, and play defense instead of offense against it.

    There’s too much “abundance of caution” and not enough “abundance of courage”.

    And, unfortunately, I think some of that comes from political advisers. I’m wondering if it’s something they are teaching in political science classes or it’s an effect of the 24/7 media + Internet culture where an innocuous remark can go viral.

  9. Debt Too High

    Aug 30th, 2010

    @ debt to high – Do you think you are me?

Leave a Reply


- will not be published