send to a friend | print | comment
LEFTOVERS: Vets in the 10th, JoePa in the 11th, Tea Party (again) on the 7th
It was a day for veterans to speak out in the 10th Congressional District Tuesday.
First, incumbent Democrat Chris Carney rolled out his military-guy-supporters to speak out against Republican opponent Tom Marino. You might remember that Carney was peeved that Marino attacked him for not signing on to an anti-abortion bill while he was tending to his cancer-stricken wife, and then twisting the knife while Carney was on active duty and couldn’t respond. So Carney, a Navy reservist, trotted out some of his fellow men in uniform to make the case that Marino’s attack “questions military directives” and “disparages veterans.”
“If this week has taught us nothing else, it is that Mr. Marino is a politician willing to disrespect the sacrifice our troops make everyday in an effort to win a news cycle,” former Army Sgt. Matt Kramer said in a campaign statement, one of several vets the Carney folks quoted. “As a veteran of combat in two overseas operations, I find it disgusting that Congressman Carney’s service to his country would be used as a political issue, and that Mr. Marino would do so in a way that so-obviously conveyed not only his lack of respect for Reservists and others who serve our country admirably, but demonstrated a true lack of knowledge of the Uniformed Code of Military Conduct.”
Marino essentially responded to all this by saying “hey, military guys like me, too.” His campaign, naturally, rolled out its own set of veteran supporters, who set Carney was politicizing his service.
“As a retired general I am disappointed that Chris Carney is playing politics with his military service,” Army Major General Dan O’Neill said. “As a citizen I am disappointed that Chris Carney says one thing in the district and does another when he gets to Washington D.C. Chris Carney should campaign on the issues and stop playing politics by making false accusations against Tom Marino.”
Anyone still remember how this started?
Elsewhere in northeast Pennsylvania, we saw the always-enjoyable intersection of sports and politics. It started when Congressman Glenn Thompson (R-5) circulated a letter among his Pennsylvania colleagues asking President Obama to give Penn State football coach Joe Paterno the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Of the 19 members of the state’s delegation, 17 signed it. Only Congressmen Chaka Fattah (D-2) and Paul Kanjorski (D-11) didn’t.
Naturally, this rubbed Kanjorski’s opponent the wrong way. So Hazleton Mayor Lou Barletta’s campaign called “off-sides” on Kanjorski. Clearly the third contest between these two is only getting more bitter.
“Joe Paterno is a living legend in Pennsylvania,” Barletta campaign spokesman Shawn Kelly said. “His list of accomplishments and achievements—both on and off the field—is pages long. Paterno is more than a football coach. He is a very gracious and generous man, supporting many worthwhile university and community projects. It’s extremely hard to comprehend why Kanjorski did not sign this nomination letter for JoePa. Even the most die-hard fans of other teams recognize Joe Paterno’s place in the history of college sports. By failing to sign this letter, Kanjorski shows once again how out of touch he is.”
Kanjorski’s countered that Congress should be focusing on jobs, and not “politicizing football.”
“Joe Paterno is a hero of Pennsylvania,” Kanjorski said in a statement. “His dedicated work and leadership both on and off the football field is of great service to both Penn State and the Commonwealth. In addition to his many feats on the field, he has encouraged one of the highest graduation rates among college football players showing his dedication to both academics and football. He also creates an atmosphere that fosters emerging talent, as can be seen with Matt McGloin, a West Scranton graduate and former walk-on, who may become the team’s starting quarterback. Joe Paterno has fostered great pride in Penn State from all Pennsylvanians. At this time, Congress should focus its efforts on creating jobs in our communities and reviving the economy, rather than politicizing football. This is where my focus has been and where it will continue to be.”
And finally, we’re still hearing from Tea Party folks peeved about how things are going in the 7th Congressional District. Last week they asked independent Jim Schneller to get out of the race since he’s emerged as Democrat Bryan Lentz’s spoiler candidate. This week they’re peeved at Lentz for continually referring to Schneller as the “Tea Party candidate.” Schneller has alternately described himself as a Tea Party candidate or not a Tea Party candidate, depending on the day he’s asked.
Regardless, he’s running on the American Congress Party ticket, and the local Tea Party group in Philly has endorsed Republican Pat Meehan. That group, the Independence Hall Tea Party, told Lentz Tuesday to stop referring to Schneller as one of their own.
“The Lentz campaign is using Schneller as a pawn to divide the Tea Party vote,” the Tea Party PAC’s president Don Adams said in a statement. “Mr. Lentz and his campaign staff have deliberately attempted to manipulate the Tea Party vote by repeatedly referring to Schneller as the Tea Party candidate—knowing full well that Schneller labels himself as a candidate of the American Congress Party. … Someone should send a memo to Bryan Lentz: ‘The Tea Party movement will not back a spoiler named Schneller. We have endorsed Pat Meehan, and, on November 2, we will fire Nancy Pelosi.’”
August 10, 2010 at 11:55 pm
Tags: Bryan Lentz, Chris Carney, Jim Schneller, Lou Barletta, PA-10, PA-11, PA-7, Pat Meehan, Paul Kanjorski, Tom Marino













sick of it all
Aug 11th, 2010
if it was never clear, it is now…the tea party movement in the SE is a joke…a sham to hide the damaged GOP Brand behind…Pat Meehan is a child of the republican Machine that brought you Curt Weldon and his rubber-stamping of the GWB tax cut/spendathon that brought us into recession-he is not the type of gut the real tea party would back…Schneller, like him or not is that type of guy…to try and silence him is unamerican.
Anonymous
Aug 11th, 2010
actually this site and others keep saying that the two tea party groups, Independence and Delco are against Schneller and for Meehan. The Delco Patriots have never actually announced that. The only person announcing that is Don Adams for Independence Tea Party. I have yet to see a Delco Patriots press release or independent signed announcement to that fact. It looks like Adams is a Meehan supporter and is trying to fool the media. Schneller has considerable tea party support and has been well received at various tea party events. Someone should actually check to see if the Delco Patriots are supporting Meehan before it gets reported all of the place.
Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D.
Aug 12th, 2010
It is important to differentiate those Tea Party organizations that endorse…from those that simply educate.
In this instance, the Independence Hall Tea Party PAC is to be distinguished from both the “Association” and other such groups in the Delaware Valley.
That is why, for example the Adams-Siblings [Don and Teri] have held $-raisers for certain candidates (including, it may be recalled, a “D” running in last May’s Primary).
Finally, Curt Weldon was RR’ed because of his expressed-view that 9-11 was preventable; note that there has not been any FBI-indictment following pre-election raids on his and his daughter’s homes.
It is not “un-American” to ensure that people who have submitted fraudulent signatures are not included on the ballot, notwithstanding whether there is or is not a functional set of Tea Party Movements in the region.
Dan Hirschhorn
Aug 12th, 2010
Hey folks,
Sorry it took me so long to chime in here. I reviewed our coverage, and as far as I can see, we never actually reported that Meehan was endorsed by the Delco Patriots.
He was endorsed by the Independence Hall Tea Party PAC, which we have reported. It’s always been my understanding that the Delco Patriots have yet to make an endorsement.
So at the moment, no correction is warranted.
However, a good point that has been raised here and elsewhere concerns the letter sent to Schneller, purportedly from both the Independence Hall group and the Delco group. The letter asks Schneller to step aside, and considering that the Delco group hasn’t made an endorsement yet, this should have raised a red flag for me.
That it didn’t was a mistake I regret.
Some have suggested that Don Adams and Independence Hall are speaking out of turn for the Delco Patriots.
I can’t yet say if this is the case. But I will definitely look into it, and report back if I find anything of consequence.
Thanks so much as always for reading, and for your feedback.
Dan Hirschhorn
Don Adams
Aug 5th, 2011
The Independence Hall Tea Party PAC spoke for itself in the above matter.
We do not, as a rule, speak for other groups.
We greatly respect the leadership and independence of the Delco Patriots.
Sincerely,
Don Adams, PAC President