The Washington Post

pa2012.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it

LEFTOVERS: RJC on Sestak, Onorato on corruption, labor for Callahan

Democrat Joe Sestak continues to take hits on the Israel issue.

The Republican Jewish Coalition unveiled the latest anti-Sestak ad this week. It revives a common complaint Sestak has faced from conservatives: that during the most recent war in Gaza, Sestak signed onto a letter calling for more humanitarian aid. But it seems to go a little far in implying that Sestak wasn’t on Israel’s “side”—the letter in question made the signers support for Israel clear, and Sestak has since voiced support for various parts of the country’s military blockades of Gaza.

Anyway, we’re going to give the ad a more complete fact-check soon. But in the meantime, you can check it out at bottom. It’s airing on cable. On a related note, stay tuned, loyal readers, for a new TV ad fact-checking policy that we’ll soon be unveiling.

Meanwhile, Democrat Dan Onorato’s campaign continue its efforts to build the argument that gubernatorial rival Tom Corbett is politicizing the attorney general’s office. In this case, Onorato seized upon a complaint filed by activist and thorn-in-politician’s-sides Gene Stilp, who is running for state House in Dauphin County. Stilp is peeved about robo-calls run by GOP state House incumbents, calls that are apparently taxpayer funded. The state Senate has already banned the practice; the House hasn’t.

So Onorato used Stilp’s complaint to allege anew that Corbett is holding the prosecutorial fire on his Republican allies. The so-called Bonsugate grand jury impaneled for Corbett’s legislative corruption probe has indicted Republicans like former House Speaker John Perzel. But Onorato’s campaign revived accusations that Corbett used taxpayer-funded public service announcements on TV in the run up to the 2008 general election, and recalled that a newspaper analysis found an increase in his office’s press releases and his official public appearances as Election Day approached that year.

“Tom Corbett’s actions—or inaction—fundamentally call into question his judgment,” Onorato campaign spokesman Brian Herman said in a statement. “Dan Onorato is the only candidate for governor who has a record of reforming government, balancing the budget and turning around the economy, and a positive vision for Pennsylvania’s future.”

A spokesman for the attorney general’s office said the office doesn’t comment on “dubious political attacks.” A campaign spokesman for Corbett scoffed: “It’s the sign of a desperate campaign when you have to rely on Gene Stilp to generate your news.”

And finally, there were some not-so-surprising endorsements in the 15th Congressional District Tuesday, when Democratic challenger John Callahan rolled out a string of supporter in organized labor. It’s hardly unexpected for union folks to line up behind the Democrat as November looms. But anyway, Callahan’s campaign boasted a list of 31 labor organizations that are backing the Bethlehem mayor in his bid against Congressman Charlie Dent (R-15), including the AFL-CIO, government employee unions, construction unions and more.

“Mayor Callahan has made putting people back to work his top priority and the Building Trades is proud to stand with him,” Mark Snyder, president of the Lehigh Valley Building and Construction Trades, said in a campaign statement.

share001btn LEFTOVERS: RJC on Sestak, Onorato on corruption, labor for Callahan

August 17, 2010 at 11:10 pm

--Dan Hirschhorn

Tags: , , , , ,

comments

comments [8] | post a comment

  1. David Diano

    Aug 18th, 2010

    The US should break the blockade with food, medicine, and other non-military supplies and render humanitarian aid.

    In the Dec 2008 “war” with Gaza, 13 Israeli’s were killed vs 1,600 Palestinians. That’s over a 100-to-1 kill ratio.

    The idea that Gaza poses a viable threat to Israel is ridiculous. More Israelis are killed by Israeli drunk drivers than by Palestinians.

  2. To DD:

    Perhaps you would not mind having spent a few days in Sderot, where schoolchildren had mere SECONDS to seek cover after radar detected incoming rockets.

    Perhaps you didn’t know that the blockade (which, BTW, includes Egypt) doesn’t block your list of humanitarian aid…and never did.

    Disregarding your “kill-ratio” perspective…or if you desire, placing it within a larger context of the “denominator” of available targets…you ignore the thrust of the self-defense concern.

    Have you ever listened to the terrorists’ claim that they wish to kill all Jews/Israelis?

  3. sue

    Aug 18th, 2010

    The vast majority of Jewish, in fact all rational, voters see this attempt to undermine Joe’s support among us as a cynical and inaccurate portrayal of his record. Toomey may have unlimited money from his buddies on the right to saturate the airwaves, but he does not have the values or voting record to represent the best interests of the people of Pennsylvania

  4. David Diano

    Aug 18th, 2010

    Robert-
    While I support Israel’s right to self-defense, I disagree that the actions they are taking in Gaza are actually for self-defense, but rather for pure punishment of the citizens of Gaza. They are denying building supplies under the (weak) argument that while such supplies are needed for housing, they “could” be used to build fortified bunkers.

    http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jul/06/world/la-fg-israel-gaza-20100706

    Israel has tanks, helicopters, fighter jets and nuclear weapons. Israel dropped cluster bombs (which predominantly kill civilians and children encountering leftover bomblets) on Lebanon a few years ago. Hardly an act of self-defense.

    My point is that Israel’s actions are not proportional and rarely rise to the level of self-defense that they claim.

  5. 95 South

    Aug 18th, 2010

    Hello Dave, miss me? Proportionality is relative. All the Arabs have to do is stop Hamas from lobbing bombs into Israel, but then Hamas would have to actually admit that Israel has a right to exist, which now they do not.

  6. David Diano

    Aug 18th, 2010

    95 South-
    1-to-1 not 100-to-1 is a proportional response. Punishing innocent civilians and children is not.

    Why do “All the Arabs” have to do anything? How about “All the Israelis” admitting there is a humanitarian crisis and ending it?

    BTW, according to the anti-defamation league’s new “theory”: Having the “right to exist” doesn’t mean you can exist anywhere you want.

    This sounds surprisingly similar to the position that Israel can exist, but just not on land the Arabs believe belongs to the Palestinians.

    My point here is that Israel is no “saint” in this either and the US needs to hold Israel to a fair and reasonable standard, rather than pander to them because of Israel’s strong political lobby.

  7. Republicans4Sestak

    Aug 18th, 2010

    It is unfortunate that Pat Toomey and so many within the Republican Party these days have a difficult time deciding if the capitol of the United States is in Washington DC or Tel Aviv.

  8. 95 South

    Aug 20th, 2010

    To quote Dave Diano;

    “BTW, according to the anti-defamation league’s new “theory”: Having the “right to exist” doesn’t mean you can exist anywhere you want.”

    Dave, would you apply this theory to the Mosque at Ground Zero?

Leave a Reply


- will not be published