send to a friend | print | comment
Dem ad against Toomey repeats debunked derivatives attack
Democrats are once again going after Republican Senate candidate Pat Toomey, trying to blame his role as a derivatives trader for the financial crisis. But in doing so, the party is relying on an attack that has already been thoroughly discredited.
A new ad from the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, embedded at bottom, says Toomey “helped pioneer the use of derivatives” that “wound up nearly destroying our economy.” Toomey was indeed a derivatives trader in 1980s, but he dealt in currency derivatives, whereas the so-called credit default swaps that many blame for contributing to the financial crisis weren’t invented until later.
This was noted by fact-checkers as long ago as April of last year, when FactCheck.org called out Senator Arlen Specter for taking a similar shot at Toomey. Specter’s campaign later adjusted the ad.
The 30-second spot is airing statewide, according to someone familiar with the ad buy. The precise size of the buy is unclear. As of late Friday morning, an independent expenditure report had yet to be published on the Federal Election Commission’s Web site. With Democratic nominee Joe Sestak rebuilding his coffers after a competitive primary and Toomey having been on the air for months, it’s the first time a Democratic Party organization has stepped in to fill the hole.
Even before the DSCC formally unveiled the ad, Toomey’s campaign was already pushing back, noting that the derivatives claim had been previously debunked.
The ad also claims Toomey “wrote the law to weaken oversight of Wall Street,” referring to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, which repealed Glass-Steagall financial regulations for the first time since the Great Depression. Toomey did acknowledge in his own congressional bio that he helped “craft” the legislation, but he didn’t cosponsor it.
He did vote in favor of it, along with a vast majority of Democrats. President Bill Clinton also supported it at the time, and has continued to voice support for it. Economists are divided about what role it played in bringing on the recession.
Going after Toomey for the Glass-Steagall repeal has been a cornerstone of Sestak’s campaign, but the bipartisan support the legislation enjoyed at the time makes it a trickier rallying cry. Democrats with whom Sestak has campaigned, including former Congressman Joe Hoeffel, voted for the bill.
August 13, 2010 at 11:28 am
Tags: DSCC, Joe Sestak, Pat Toomey













DSCC ad targets Toomey… | GrassrootsPA
Aug 13th, 2010
[...] Repeats debunked derivatives attack… [...]
sue
Aug 13th, 2010
Sure, there is more than one kind of derivative, BUT Toomey has consistently promoted and votewd for policies that benefit the fraudsters of Wall Street at the expense of everyone else. If elected, would he represent MY middle-class best interests?He stands by his love of privatization of Social Security and tax cuts for the wealthy.
His “drown the governments in the bathtub” type prescriptions would just further enhance the power of corporations to loot our economy and destroy our democracy.
Only 6 Hours Old and DSSC Ad Already Debunked by PA Reporters | Politics PA
Aug 13th, 2010
[...] – the same debunked attacks Senator Arlen Specter tried to use. Read the piece below: http://www.pa2010.com/2010/08/dem-ad-against-toomey-repeats-debunked-derivatives-attack/ Dem ad against Toomey repeats debunked derivatives attack Democrats are once again going [...]
ChescoTom
Aug 13th, 2010
Truly pathetic job by the DSCC. Those geniuses inside the Beltway did not bother to research the race let alone the facts. With friends like these Joe, who needs an opponent. In all honesty, Sestak was doing a bang up job losing this race all by himself.
The Opening Salvo | PAWaterCooler.com
Aug 13th, 2010
[...] for derivative trading that contributed to the financial crisis has been debunked before [here]. The AP [...]
Lou H.
Aug 18th, 2010
> Truly pathetic job by the DSCC. Those geniuses inside the Beltway did not bother to research the race let alone the facts.
It actually *is* genius to use fallacies to criticize your opponent, as it will take him awhile (and waste his money) to fight back. Both parties do this.
play_jurist
Sep 3rd, 2010
Toomey should split hairs and get the details straight. He is a Wall Street insider and was even president of a deregulation lobbying firm. But it’s also correct that the derivatives he dealt with as a Wall Street insider are not identical to credit default swaps.