send to a friend | print | comment
Toomey outraises Sestak, but cash situation remains murkier
Republican Senate candidate Pat Toomey continued to raise cash at a prolific pace last quarter, smashing his previous best as he kept turning heads with his growing prowess in the money race. But Democratic opponent Joe Sestak also enjoyed impressive fundraising success after dispatching Arlen Specter in the May primary.
And with Toomey already on the air, polls showing forecasting a close race and the candidates’ respective parties confronting different spending scenarios in the Keystone State, the actual financial state of the competitive Senate race was less clear Tuesday, as both campaigns sought to win a news cycle with their fundraising numbers.
Toomey’s campaign said it raised $3.1 million between April 1 and June 30, his best quarter so far. Sestak’s campaign said it raised almost $2 million during the same period. About $1.6 million of that was raised after the May 18 primary. When full campaign finance reports are filed later this month, Toomey will report finishing the quarter with about $4.6 million in the bank, compared to more than $2 million for Sestak.
“I am so appreciative for all the support I have received for my candidacy,” Toomey said in a statement. “As I travel across the state, I meet more and more Pennsylvanians who want to join our campaign in order to bring true change and fiscal sanity to Washington. If I am elected to the U.S. Senate, I intend to do just that.”
Both campaigns appear to be raising money at a faster clip than ever before. But while Sestak’s spending effectively went dead after he dispatched Specter, Toomey has spent more heavily. He actually had slightly less money in the bank on June 30 than he did at the close of the pre-primary reporting period on April 28. And that was before he began a statewide ad buy with five new TV spots.
Exactly how that money is being spent remains to be seen from the full reports. But Toomey campaign manager Mark Harris said the campaign is spending money at a sensible rate. He noted that the campaign’s current cash-on-hand number includes money that was spent on both a pre-primary ad buy and a smaller post-primary ad buy that sought to slow Sestak’s momentum.
“The whole point of raising money is to spend it, to win voters over,” Harris said. “Is [Sestak] up on television today? No.
“He’s also sitting in a much easier spot because the big Democratic donors haven’t given him anything,” Harris added of Sestak. “So he can just go around getting checks. All things told, we’re very happy with where things are at the moment.”
Toomey also has another advantage: National Democrats already spent most of the $1.7 million limit for coordinated spending on Specter’s primary, whereas Republicans can still spend that money on Toomey (both parties can still make unlimited, independent expenditures).
Sestak’s fundraising clearly picked up with Specter out of the picture, partly, Politico reports, due to Sestak’s courtship of Specter donors.
“The response around the state to Joe’s message of putting working families first has been tremendous,” Sestak campaign spokesman Jonathon Dworkin said. “We are especially encouraged by the generous support that allowed him to do so well in such a short period of time. As Joe crisscrosses Pennsylvania—like he did in attending more than 650 event from January 1 through the primary—we find that Pennsylvania voters are looking for the pragmatic approach he offers and not a return to an ideology that puts big corporations first in the hope that the wealth will trickle down.”
July 13, 2010 at 6:11 pm
Tags: Joe Sestak, Pat Toomey













David Diano
Jul 13th, 2010
So Sestak drained his campaign to practically zero, with few reserves. Instead, we could have had Specter with over $7 million.
Toomey is raising at a much faster clip and has the advantage of more party money to come. Toomey is avoiding the mistakes of Weldon and Specter by using his financial edge to spend early, when Sestak can’t afford to respond.
Toomey is wrong on the issues, but a lot of voters are too scarred or stupid to realize that. The election could go either way, but Toomey seems to have a lot of material advantages.
Either way, we still lose.
1994 Again
Jul 13th, 2010
The Toomey fundraising Juggernaut continues. Sestak will have less money against Republicans in a big GOP year. Yet another pick-up for the GOP.
debt to high
Jul 13th, 2010
David,
We win if Toomey wins. Toomey knows how to create jobs where all Joe knows how to do is rubber stamp what Nancy tells too.
We need an independent mind in Washington. Toomey is a man who term limited himself. His word means something. Joe can’t even explain what type of job was offered to him to stay out of the Senate Primary. Voters want clear answers not bull and bull is all joe can offer.
TB
Jul 14th, 2010
Toomey knows how to cut taxes on the wealthy. Cutting taxes on the wealthy does not create jobs.
IntelligentVoter
Jul 14th, 2010
Not so fast…….The Harris quote is exactly what is now offending people…….
“The whole point of raising money is to spend it, to win voters over,” Harris said.
The notion of “winning over voters” or “buying them off” is becoming more and more offensive …be it from Democrats or Republicans. Eventually, the truth will come out how Obama raised his money but it may take years.
Thus, this may be one year where money won’t be the answer.
term limits?
Jul 14th, 2010
@debt to high
“Toomey is a man who term limited himself.”
He didn’t. He did, however, lose a bruising GOP primary against Specter by 10K votes. Since he couldn’t run for both House and Senate at the same time he had to give up his seat.
David Diano
Jul 14th, 2010
debt-
if either of these bozos win, we all lose.
intel-
winning over voters simply means getting your message out. it’s not buying votes