<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Sestak says he&#8217;s a staunch supporter of Israel</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/</link> <description>Your destination for PA&#039;s Big 2012 Election Races</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Joe Sestak Would Die for Israel &#171; Mantiq al-Tayr</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-23587</link> <dc:creator>Joe Sestak Would Die for Israel &#171; Mantiq al-Tayr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:26:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-23587</guid> <description>[...] I mention that Sestak is an obvious war monger against Iran?  How about that he has been to Israel 8 times and that he is &#8220;a staunch supporter of Israel&#8221;? Just wanted to let you [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I mention that Sestak is an obvious war monger against Iran?  How about that he has been to Israel 8 times and that he is &#8220;a staunch supporter of Israel&#8221;? Just wanted to let you [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lance Chang</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21976</link> <dc:creator>Lance Chang</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:18:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21976</guid> <description>Here&#039;s a conversation between Joe Sestak and Bill Clinton:In the summer of 2009, the cell phone of Rep. Joe Sestak (D., Pa.) was ringing.
Sestak: Hello?Bill Clinton: Admiral Sestak, hi, it&#039;s Bill Clinton.Sestak: President Clinton! What a nice surprise.Clinton: Please, call me Bill.Sestak: Please, call me Admiral.Clinton: How&#039;ve you been, Admiral?Sestak: Fine, sir, fine. I&#039;m steaming full speed ahead in the House. Some of my staffers want four hours of sleep a night. Can you believe that? Civilians!Clinton: You always were the hardest-working guy in my White House.Sestak: Thank you, sir. Serving on your National Security Council was an honor for which I&#039;ll always be grateful.Clinton: Speaking of gratitude, Admiral, I have a personal favor to ask.Sestak: Fire away, sir.Clinton: Rahm Emanuel is a dear friend, and I&#039;m proud that President Obama made him his chief of staff. Rahm asked me to call you.Sestak: Why?Clinton: They don&#039;t want you to run against Arlen Specter for Senate.Sestak: But, sir, my mind is made up. I&#039;m going to run.Clinton: I knew you&#039;d say that. So I&#039;ve been authorized to offer you a prestigious new position if you&#039;ll reconsider.Sestak: What&#039;s that?Clinton: It&#039;s called &quot;Special Adviser on Presidential Problems.&quot; They created it just for you.Sestak: S.A.P.P.?Clinton: Yes. And if you agree to be a SAPP, Admiral, you will become one of the president&#039;s most trusted counselors.Sestak: Where would my office be - in the West Wing?Clinton: Your office would be at 1022 Longworth Building, Washington, D.C.Sestak: But that&#039;s where my office is now.Clinton: Exactly. The president wants you to keep your House seat.Sestak: But how could I serve in Congress and work at the White House?Clinton: They&#039;d call you when they needed you, Admiral. It would be an unpaid position. They can&#039;t offer you anything of monetary value, legally speaking. Say, we&#039;re not being recorded, are we?Sestak: Sir, I can&#039;t do it.Clinton: Admiral, I should also mention that Senator Specter holds a special place in my heart. Back when he was a Republican, he voted against my impeachment conviction. Remember all his yammering about Scottish law? To this day, I still don&#039;t know what he meant. But what a clever guy - saved my presidency.Sestak: I appreciate that, sir. But I&#039;ve decided to run for Senate.Clinton: Very well, Admiral. I told Rahm I would try. One more thing: Let&#039;s not tell anyone we had this conversation, OK?Sestak: Aye, aye, sir. Who would believe it anyway?http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/95836919.html#axzz0qHqOgg36</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a conversation between Joe Sestak and Bill Clinton:</p><p>In the summer of 2009, the cell phone of Rep. Joe Sestak (D., Pa.) was ringing.<br
/> Sestak: Hello?</p><p>Bill Clinton: Admiral Sestak, hi, it&#8217;s Bill Clinton.</p><p>Sestak: President Clinton! What a nice surprise.</p><p>Clinton: Please, call me Bill.</p><p>Sestak: Please, call me Admiral.</p><p>Clinton: How&#8217;ve you been, Admiral?</p><p>Sestak: Fine, sir, fine. I&#8217;m steaming full speed ahead in the House. Some of my staffers want four hours of sleep a night. Can you believe that? Civilians!</p><p>Clinton: You always were the hardest-working guy in my White House.</p><p>Sestak: Thank you, sir. Serving on your National Security Council was an honor for which I&#8217;ll always be grateful.</p><p>Clinton: Speaking of gratitude, Admiral, I have a personal favor to ask.</p><p>Sestak: Fire away, sir.</p><p>Clinton: Rahm Emanuel is a dear friend, and I&#8217;m proud that President Obama made him his chief of staff. Rahm asked me to call you.</p><p>Sestak: Why?</p><p>Clinton: They don&#8217;t want you to run against Arlen Specter for Senate.</p><p>Sestak: But, sir, my mind is made up. I&#8217;m going to run.</p><p>Clinton: I knew you&#8217;d say that. So I&#8217;ve been authorized to offer you a prestigious new position if you&#8217;ll reconsider.</p><p>Sestak: What&#8217;s that?</p><p>Clinton: It&#8217;s called &#8220;Special Adviser on Presidential Problems.&#8221; They created it just for you.</p><p>Sestak: S.A.P.P.?</p><p>Clinton: Yes. And if you agree to be a SAPP, Admiral, you will become one of the president&#8217;s most trusted counselors.</p><p>Sestak: Where would my office be &#8211; in the West Wing?</p><p>Clinton: Your office would be at 1022 Longworth Building, Washington, D.C.</p><p>Sestak: But that&#8217;s where my office is now.</p><p>Clinton: Exactly. The president wants you to keep your House seat.</p><p>Sestak: But how could I serve in Congress and work at the White House?</p><p>Clinton: They&#8217;d call you when they needed you, Admiral. It would be an unpaid position. They can&#8217;t offer you anything of monetary value, legally speaking. Say, we&#8217;re not being recorded, are we?</p><p>Sestak: Sir, I can&#8217;t do it.</p><p>Clinton: Admiral, I should also mention that Senator Specter holds a special place in my heart. Back when he was a Republican, he voted against my impeachment conviction. Remember all his yammering about Scottish law? To this day, I still don&#8217;t know what he meant. But what a clever guy &#8211; saved my presidency.</p><p>Sestak: I appreciate that, sir. But I&#8217;ve decided to run for Senate.</p><p>Clinton: Very well, Admiral. I told Rahm I would try. One more thing: Let&#8217;s not tell anyone we had this conversation, OK?</p><p>Sestak: Aye, aye, sir. Who would believe it anyway?</p><p><a
href="http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/95836919.html#axzz0qHqOgg36" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.philly.com%2Finquirer%2Fopinion%2F95836919.html%23axzz0qHqOgg36','http%3A%2F%2Fwww.philly.com%2Finquirer%2Fopinion%2F95836919.html%23axzz0qHqOgg36')" rel="nofollow">http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/95836919.html#axzz0qHqOgg36</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Diano</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21961</link> <dc:creator>David Diano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:08:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21961</guid> <description>Bill-
Joe absolutely did say that the offer was contingent on him getting out of the race. That was the whole point, whether he was offered a job to get out of the race and Joe&#039;s answer was &quot;Yes&quot;.Here is the transcript:
&lt;I&gt;“Larry Kane: I have a question for you. I don’t know how accurate this is but a lot of reports are that the party has tried very hard to get you out of this race.Joe Sestak: Haha, yes.LK: &lt;b&gt;Were you ever offered a federal job to get out of this race?&lt;/b&gt;JS: &lt;b&gt;Yes.&lt;/b&gt;
LK: Was it the Navy Secretary?JS: No comment. I – let me –LK: Was it high-ranking?JS: Let me just say that &lt;b&gt;both here in Pennsylvania and down there, I was called quite a few times&lt;/b&gt; and all I’ve said is, look, I felt when a deal was made that it was hurting the democratic process, I got into this because I think that deal started getting us off the track of where the Democratic party should go. I would never get out for a deal. I’m in this for the Democratic principles and working families.LK: Okay, but, was there a job offered to you by the White House?JS: Ye-LK: That’s what I want –JS: Yes. Someone offered — yeah.LK: &lt;b&gt;It was big, right&lt;/b&gt;?JS: &lt;b&gt;It was&lt;/b&gt; — never — let me not comment on it. We had a closed comm–
&lt;/i&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill-<br
/> Joe absolutely did say that the offer was contingent on him getting out of the race. That was the whole point, whether he was offered a job to get out of the race and Joe&#8217;s answer was &#8220;Yes&#8221;.</p><p>Here is the transcript:<br
/> <i>“Larry Kane: I have a question for you. I don’t know how accurate this is but a lot of reports are that the party has tried very hard to get you out of this race.</p><p>Joe Sestak: Haha, yes.</p><p>LK: <b>Were you ever offered a federal job to get out of this race?</b></p><p>JS: <b>Yes.</b><br
/> LK: Was it the Navy Secretary?</p><p>JS: No comment. I – let me –</p><p>LK: Was it high-ranking?</p><p>JS: Let me just say that <b>both here in Pennsylvania and down there, I was called quite a few times</b> and all I’ve said is, look, I felt when a deal was made that it was hurting the democratic process, I got into this because I think that deal started getting us off the track of where the Democratic party should go. I would never get out for a deal. I’m in this for the Democratic principles and working families.</p><p>LK: Okay, but, was there a job offered to you by the White House?</p><p>JS: Ye-</p><p>LK: That’s what I want –</p><p>JS: Yes. Someone offered — yeah.</p><p>LK: <b>It was big, right</b>?</p><p>JS: <b>It was</b> — never — let me not comment on it. We had a closed comm–<br
/> </i></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lana</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21954</link> <dc:creator>Lana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:47:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21954</guid> <description>Will Sestak ever once tell the truth ?  I know and have followed each of the Candidates and the best I can see is  NONE OF THE ABOVE !  One is slezzy and one is just off the chart.  Remember, you get what you ask for so I don&#039;t want to hear you crying when one of these jokers get elected. My dogs and cats are better than either of these two clowns.
Are you going to be part of the the circus that is coming to town in November.I will vote NONE OF THE ABOVE and sleep well at night.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Sestak ever once tell the truth ?  I know and have followed each of the Candidates and the best I can see is  NONE OF THE ABOVE !  One is slezzy and one is just off the chart.  Remember, you get what you ask for so I don&#8217;t want to hear you crying when one of these jokers get elected. My dogs and cats are better than either of these two clowns.<br
/> Are you going to be part of the the circus that is coming to town in November.</p><p>I will vote NONE OF THE ABOVE and sleep well at night.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bill healy</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21950</link> <dc:creator>bill healy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:01:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21950</guid> <description>matt explain to me why voters would be troubled that the white house offered Joe Sestak a job or position that he turned down? Joe never made any claim other than that he was approached with an offer, never stated it was conditional on him quitting the race,or that it was a paid job. question the white house or the media.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matt explain to me why voters would be troubled that the white house offered Joe Sestak a job or position that he turned down? Joe never made any claim other than that he was approached with an offer, never stated it was conditional on him quitting the race,or that it was a paid job. question the white house or the media.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Diano</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21935</link> <dc:creator>David Diano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:04:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21935</guid> <description>Anonymous-
Well, Sestak is pretty oily. So, maybe they needed some for the ceremonies. :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous-<br
/> Well, Sestak is pretty oily. So, maybe they needed some for the ceremonies. <img
src='http://www.pa2012.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21930</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 03:26:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21930</guid> <description>Why does sestak have to mention that he sat down with Israeli officials &quot;on the eve of Chanukah.&quot; That&#039;s erie...guess he&#039;s making a parallel between himself and the miracle of lights.sheeeeesh. i&#039;m surprised there&#039;s enough room for him and his ego in that tiny country.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does sestak have to mention that he sat down with Israeli officials &#8220;on the eve of Chanukah.&#8221; That&#8217;s erie&#8230;guess he&#8217;s making a parallel between himself and the miracle of lights.</p><p>sheeeeesh. i&#8217;m surprised there&#8217;s enough room for him and his ego in that tiny country.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Diano</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21915</link> <dc:creator>David Diano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 02:19:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21915</guid> <description>Bill-
Joe&#039;s &quot;truthful answer&quot; as you call it, referred to a high ranking federal job. So, was Joe lying then or is Joe lying now, when he claims it was an unpaid advisory position after all?
You can&#039;t have it both ways as the stories are contradictory.&quot;An unpaid position is still a job&quot;??? Really???
Tell you what Bill, when you are making calls for Sestak about the unemployment situation in this country and Joe&#039;s &quot;plans&quot;... you just tell that &quot;An unpaid position is still a job&quot;.
Maybe you can be in one of Joe&#039;s commercials saying that.Bill, as for this &quot;Gem&quot;:
&quot;The Democratic voters of Pennsylvania didn’t see him as unqualified to be our next Senator&quot;
Actually, 46% of those that voted in the Primary DID see Joe as unqualified (or qualified but less desirable). The 54% of Primary voters that actually chose Sestak represent only 13% of the registered Democrats in Pennsylvania. That&#039;s about 1 in 8.Matt-
I guess with Bill&#039;s definition, he can claim he has a &quot;high ranking job&quot; working for Sestak.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill-<br
/> Joe&#8217;s &#8220;truthful answer&#8221; as you call it, referred to a high ranking federal job. So, was Joe lying then or is Joe lying now, when he claims it was an unpaid advisory position after all?<br
/> You can&#8217;t have it both ways as the stories are contradictory.</p><p> &#8220;An unpaid position is still a job&#8221;??? Really???<br
/> Tell you what Bill, when you are making calls for Sestak about the unemployment situation in this country and Joe&#8217;s &#8220;plans&#8221;&#8230; you just tell that &#8220;An unpaid position is still a job&#8221;.<br
/> Maybe you can be in one of Joe&#8217;s commercials saying that.</p><p> Bill, as for this &#8220;Gem&#8221;:<br
/> &#8220;The Democratic voters of Pennsylvania didn’t see him as unqualified to be our next Senator&#8221;<br
/> Actually, 46% of those that voted in the Primary DID see Joe as unqualified (or qualified but less desirable). The 54% of Primary voters that actually chose Sestak represent only 13% of the registered Democrats in Pennsylvania. That&#8217;s about 1 in 8.</p><p>Matt-<br
/> I guess with Bill&#8217;s definition, he can claim he has a &#8220;high ranking job&#8221; working for Sestak.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matt M.</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21910</link> <dc:creator>Matt M.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:30:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21910</guid> <description>Bill, an unpaid position is not a job. It&#039;s an assignment, a consultantcy, an advisory role. It&#039;s not a job &quot;as in&quot; what anyone in common parlance would understand the term to mean.I serve on the board of a community organization. Is that my &quot;job?&quot; When I take over the role of chair, have I been &quot;promoted?&quot; Absolutely not. David Diano has already made this point, and quite clearly in my view.What&#039;s more, Sestak&#039;s performance on &quot;Meet the Press,&quot; where he flagrantly and repeatedly refused to answer direct questions and clear the air is, objectively, alarming enough to give even a politically  dispassionate observer significant pause.What I would like to see you and Bruce Bailey do is explain, coldly, objectively, and thoughtfully, why voters shouldn&#039;t be troubled by this. If all you&#039;re going to do is through &quot;your [sic] a republican rat&quot; and use profanity, then forget about responding, because you&#039;ll just pollute this blog up with --- yes --- propaganda. Nobody here appreciates that.The floor is yours. Make some good use of it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, an unpaid position is not a job. It&#8217;s an assignment, a consultantcy, an advisory role. It&#8217;s not a job &#8220;as in&#8221; what anyone in common parlance would understand the term to mean.</p><p>I serve on the board of a community organization. Is that my &#8220;job?&#8221; When I take over the role of chair, have I been &#8220;promoted?&#8221; Absolutely not. David Diano has already made this point, and quite clearly in my view.</p><p>What&#8217;s more, Sestak&#8217;s performance on &#8220;Meet the Press,&#8221; where he flagrantly and repeatedly refused to answer direct questions and clear the air is, objectively, alarming enough to give even a politically  dispassionate observer significant pause.</p><p>What I would like to see you and Bruce Bailey do is explain, coldly, objectively, and thoughtfully, why voters shouldn&#8217;t be troubled by this. If all you&#8217;re going to do is through &#8220;your [sic] a republican rat&#8221; and use profanity, then forget about responding, because you&#8217;ll just pollute this blog up with &#8212; yes &#8212; propaganda. Nobody here appreciates that.</p><p>The floor is yours. Make some good use of it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bill healy</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/06/sestak-says-hes-a-staunch-supporter-of-israel/comment-page-1/#comment-21908</link> <dc:creator>bill healy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 01:08:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=7989#comment-21908</guid> <description>The Democratic voters of Pennsylvania didn&#039;t see him as unqualified to be our next Senator. Too bad you supported a opportunistic republican. Joe never stated it was a high paying job.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic voters of Pennsylvania didn&#8217;t see him as unqualified to be our next Senator. Too bad you supported a opportunistic republican. Joe never stated it was a high paying job.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 547/548 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.pa2012.com @ 2012-02-12 02:07:16 -->
