send to a friend | print | comment
Lentz says Meehan played ‘central role’ in failure to regulate Wall Street
Democrat Bryan Lentz on Tuesday made the most substantive and direct attack yet on his Republican opponent’s ambiguous position on financial reform, criticizing Pat Meehan anew for not taking a stance on legislation moving through Congress and even laying some of the blame for the recent financial crisis at Meehan’s doorstep.
Meehan has yet to publicly take a position on financial reform legislation that has passed both chambers of Congress and awaits conference committee negotiations (Lentz supports it). And while Meehan’s campaign has sought to position him as a protector of consumers during his days as U.S. Attorney, Lentz, a state Representative, has increasingly questioned the very credentials trumpeted by his opponent. In a statement Tuesday, Lentz noted that Meehan was appointed in 2002 to a federal task force charged with investigating malfeasance by financial firms.
“Appointed by George W. Bush as a favor to [Senator] Arlen Specter,” Lentz said, “Pat Meehan played a central role in the government’s failure to oversee Wall Street—leading directly to the financial collapse—and there is every reason to believe that this failure to protect the taxpayers as a prosecutor will be continued if Meehan is allowed to go to Washington to continue fighting for Wall Street.
Lentz also noted that Meehan has received financial support from former Senator Rick Santorum and current House Minorty Leader John Boehner, both of whom oppose the current reform legislation.
“For more than a decade,” Lentz said, “congressional Republicans, many of whom have already provided significant financial and political support to Pat Meehan, looked the other way as Wall Street ran wild. This failure to protect the American taxpayers crippled our financial system and resulted in eight million jobs lost for America’s workers.”
Meehan’s campaign did not return several phone and e-mail messages seeking comment on Tuesday. The jabs from Lentz come as Democrats are feeling increasingly emboldened that GOP resistance to financial reform is a national issue working in their favor—a rare dynamic in a political climate where it is more often Republicans who are trying to nationalize local elections. The race to succeed Democrat Joe Sestak in the 7th District is currently No. 1 on the pa2010.com Congressional Power Rankings.
“Pat Meehan has already failed the taxpayers as a prosecutor and failed to stand up to the local GOP bosses in both the Civera scandal and in his own fraudulent petition scandal,” Lentz said. “Is it reasonable to think that he would stand up to the national Republican bosses who have funded his campaign and fight for real reform on Wall Street?”
June 1, 2010 at 3:17 pm
Tags: Bryan Lentz, PA-7, Pat Meehan













Trunk Man 19149
Jun 1st, 2010
Blaming the Wall Street fiasco on Meehan is a huge stretch.
J. Hughes
Jun 1st, 2010
Why is this website becoming a talking head for Lentz’s campaign. It seems that every Lentz news release is treated as breaking news that is to be taken without any investigation.
Mr. Turner
Jun 1st, 2010
Keep reaching Lentz, maybe by November you’ll find a credible story worth writing about. A desperation press release at its finest. I’m officially done reading this site.
TonySoprano
Jun 1st, 2010
So assuming Meehan actually does oppose the reform bill (and he hasn’t said that he does), how does his opposition to a bill that has strong support from Wall Street tycoons at banks like Goldman Sachs indicate that he’s in bed with Wall Street tycoons? Shouldn’t the headline here be “Bryan Lentz supports Wall Street bill supported by Wall Street”?
Dan Hirschhorn
Jun 1st, 2010
Hey J. Hughes,
I am increasingly getting complaints similar to yours.
As many readers know, I try not to engage any allegations of bias because there’s nothing one can really say to convince the skeptics.
But what I can say is this:
As a nonpartisan political news Web site focused on the minutia of strategy, we cover these types of releases from all candidates in both parties. We fact-check them where appropriate, and allow readers to make their own value judgments where appropriate. In this respect, both campaigns in the 7th District race have been treated the same way.
However, the campaigns have their own role to play by engaging (or not engaging) in the conversation. This story might have been very different if the Meehan campaign had called me back. I honestly don’t know, because I don’t know what they would have said.
But for whatever reason, the Meehan campaign appears to be speaking with pa2010.com less and less.
This is their prerogative. But it also leaves them partially responsible for the tone of the coverage. “Balance” does not mean both sides get equal time. Balance means both sides are treated equally. We simply can’t tell two sides of the story effectively if only one side is talking to us.
We will continue to report this race, and all races, aggressively and fairly.
Thanks for reading, and for your feedback.
Dan Hirschhorn
TonySoprano
Jun 1st, 2010
Dan,
I get what you’re saying about the Meehan camp ignoring you, but don’t you have some responsibility to report these things with a critical eye? Goldman Sachs, among many other Wall Street banks, supports the bill and Goldman’s CEO himself said “the biggest beneficiary of reform is Wall Street itself”…
Doesn’t the fact that this bill is supported by the Wall Street elite, not to mention the fact that Wall Street gave huge amounts of money to Obama and congressional Dems, at least partially undercut the entire validity of Lentz’s statement?
Granted, those are points that the Meehan people should have raised, but if you “fact check where appropriate”, wouldn’t those be important points to include in your story?
Dan Hirschhorn
Jun 1st, 2010
Hey TonySoprano (love your handle),
You make a fair point, and it’s one that I’ll need to consider. But this is one of those times when I go back to how narrow our niche is. We don’t dissect the merits of policy at length, leaving that for news organizations with more resources to take on such endeavors.
What we do undertake is fact-checking of basic political claims and attacks, and it’s here that I’ll be the first to admit the Meehan folks have sometimes gotten the proverbial short-end-of-the-stick on these pages. They’ve put out things that don’t past muster more than once, and we’ve called them on it (even Meehan campaign insiders have conceded this to me).
Whether or not the financial reform bill is “good” legislation is a matter of legitimate public debate, and it’s a subject on which I know our educated readers are studying up on in more appropriate venues.
All that said, your point is a good one, and I’ll keep it in mind going forward.
Thanks as always for the feedback.
Dan Hirschhorn
P. Lombardo
Jun 1st, 2010
Dear mr. Hirschhorn,
You are a liberal reporter. Period. I did some back reading and all of your articles are left leaning and in all of them you claim the Meehan campaign has been “uncooperateve.” I’m not convinced that your leftiness doesn’t have you ignoring or neglecting to contact them so you can write the “news” how you feel is appropriate. Even if you did try to contact them, I can see, by your writing bias and general attitude why they would want to avoid talking to you. Either way though I enjoy reading what you write and enjoy the comments section. Keep writing because everyone improves with practice.
Dan Hirschhorn
Jun 1st, 2010
Hey P. Lombardo,
You’re entitled to your opinion.
I always get a kick out of these bias charges, especially since they always come from all sides.
I’m confident that those who truly know my work know better.
Thanks for reading.
Dan Hirschhorn
p.s., please, call me Dan. I don’t know any Mr. Hirschhorn
1994 Again
Jun 1st, 2010
Poor desperate Lentz. Trying to get traction again. The magnitude of his loss this fall will startle even the staunchest Democrat.
As for his bizarre strategy of blaming Meehan for the country’s ills under a Democrat president and congress, normal voters will laugh at Lentz while the Moonbats applaud. In the end, it won’t matter one little bit.
C Guiney
Jun 1st, 2010
1994-
You have a problem with discussing issues?
Lombardo-
Are you calling the Meehan camp afraid to rebut/discuss issues?
TonyS-
Hirschorn is supposed to do Meehan’s job of responding to his opponent?
And all the rest of you -
Don’t you want to know where Meehan stands on the issues?
1994 Again
Jun 1st, 2010
Hey, Guiney, how about this issue: http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2010/06/01/republicans-jump-out-to-historic-lead-in-gallup-generic-ballot/
You lefties are SO Screwed this fall…
Matt M.
Jun 1st, 2010
Dan,
You guys do a great job here. I’ve been in journalism, and know how difficult it can be to present a story evenly when one of the players doesn’t provide commentary.
P. Lombardo – most of the “interesting” coverage earlier this season had to do with the Dem primaries (gov, senate), because they were contested, whereas the Repubs were not. The coverage of the 12th was very balanced, if you followed that at all.
pa2010, keep up the great reporting, it’s a real service to the people of PA.
C Guiney
Jun 1st, 2010
1994-
Thanks for the update. I guess it’s time for you to take a well deserved rest from campaigning, since you have everything locked up.
David Diano
Jun 1st, 2010
J. Hughes, TonySoprano and P. Lombardo-
Dan’s playing it very fair. A candidate makes a news release, that is a novel attack, and Dan reports it.
Dan offers the opposing candidate the opportunity to respond. If they don’t, then it’s on them, not Dan. That’s how it works in journalism. It’s not like Meehan had a response and Dan failed to report it.
Dan’s not going to write Meehan’s press releases for him. Meehan and the Delco GOP are used to having the Delco Times as part of their press team doing that job. They consider anything to the Left of Gil “The Shill” Spencer to be biased reporting. Heck, Gil often does a better job promoting them their their own press spokesmen.
Meehan’s staff would rather come here and whine and criticize Dan, than actually issue a press release or official statement. Boo. Hoo.
David Lewis
Jun 2nd, 2010
Funny last weeks Democrats were ahead
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/05/26/democrats_grab_back_lead_in_generic_ballot.html
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/05/26/republicans_losing_hispanic_voters_in_big_numbers.html
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/05/26/stimulus_package_worked_better_than_projected.html
http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/05/26/support_for_health_care_reform_increases.html
Anonymous
Jun 2nd, 2010
Meehan is running a very tight campaign and has been willing to engage the public only on a limited and very controlled basis. Financial reform is apparently an issue they don’t want to talk about. Meehan has also been reluctant to put forth specifics on his plan to cut federal spending, balance the budget etc. Has proposed some sort of constitutional amendment, but in a district that is heavily dependent on gov spending, Meehan hasn’t laid out any specifics on what programs/jobs he favors cutting. This is not just an issue for the press/blogs, it affects the lives of the districts voters, as, of course, does financial reform. It’s really about time that Meehan came out and showed the voters exactly who he is and what he intends to do. He has really no experience with constituents and no real political record. Time to put some specifics on the table.
IntelligentVoter
Jun 2nd, 2010
Gotta’ love statistics and reports and press releases – all meant to spin the reader!
In reality, most reports are written to gather facts to support the writer’s conclusion and not written to gather facts then come up with a conclusion.
Learning to read them both and between the lines is what makes people smart. Not a lot of that happening these days, though as hyper-partisanship is only increasing.
suburban dem
Jun 2nd, 2010
could care less about Lentz…just don’t want another DELCO republican. The national generic ballot is fun to look at and talk about, but in Delaware COunty, when people vote, like they do in even yeared generals, they vote against Republican policies. Pat Meehan may be a great guy but, unfortunately, he is John McNichol, Tommy Judge, Charlie Sexton, Nick Catania, Curt Weldon, Dom Pileggi and Paul Summers’ guy too, which is bad for an election, imho.
Mitchell
Jun 2nd, 2010
Keep grasping at straws, same story different day. I don’t care who the DELCO GOP is, and frankly it doesn’t even matter. As long as Nanci Pelosi keeps opening her mouth in front of a camera, and the Obama administration keeps spewing to the press and the American public the same worthless junk that’s coming out of that pipe a mile below sea level, the American public will continue to take off the rose-colored glasses and realize that the Democratic platform of false hope and fancy promises quickly fades when, after a year and a half, 9.5% of Americans are still unemployed.
Promises, Promises, Promises…business-as-usual in Washington and Harrisburg. My fellow small business owners and I are proud to support Pat Meehan for Congress.
Goodnaturedcynic
Jun 2nd, 2010
I would be willing to bet most people do not know (or care) who Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid are.
Repeating their names in every sould bite to demonize them was a flack driven spin avoid directly attacking a popular President or even talk about the substance of a given subject.
All politics is local and if Meehan dose not shift of of the trite talking ponts he is toast.
Mitchell
Jun 2nd, 2010
Popular? It’s pretty bad if even CNN is criticizing a liberal. Some transparency we’re seeing huh? November can’t come soon enough. What subject would you like to talk about sir? The fact that our President continues to blame the past administration for his mess after a year and a half in office? Arizona immigration law? The floor is your’s.
Goodnaturedcynic
Jun 2nd, 2010
I think you missed the point. Meenan is shamelessly plagiarizing themes from the RNC that dont relate to issues in his district , he has no real personal opinion on or has been silent on up to this point.
Repeating the names Pelosi, Reed as some kind of satanic cult in a word salad of catch phrases or “talking points” then claims pseudo substantively as being for small government or pro jobs are all designed to appeal base emotions
TonySoprano
Jun 2nd, 2010
Goodnatured,
It’s a good thing Bryan Lentz has been coming up with his own talking points, like blaming the financial crisis on Republicans. Gee, I wonder why pelosi and Obama haven’t thought of that?
bill healy
Jun 2nd, 2010
The past administration is responsible for the mess they left the economy in when they left. Tony Soprano,perfect name for a republican, they operate just like mafia gangsters. Did you repubs miss it when the bush admin. came and told Congress that the economy would collapse if they didn’t bail out the banks,probably crying in your beers over “I’m not a Maverick” McCain and Caribou Barbies loss in the election. Personally I don’t think the American people have as short a memory as you hope, or are nearly as dumb as you think, We know who is the party of “Drill baby Drill”. November is going to be a disaster for you guys. much like the last two elections were.
Mitchell
Jun 2nd, 2010
Good one Bill, I’m sure that “Caribou Barbie” phrase took you a while. We will see who wins in November. I’m not saying Obama caused the oil spill by any means, but this, along with the Sestak scandal and now possibly even the Blago trials have the potential to cast a very dark shadow on the Obama Presidency. We shall see.
Goodnaturedcynic
Jun 3rd, 2010
The dark shadow is the closed door meetings Cheney had in the Bush White House with the greedy oil aristocracy (including our pals at BP & Haliburton)=11 dead oil workers and half a hemisphere polluted.
Yeah people are going to give shit about Blago, and the Sestack carping. The economy,jobs, the wars and surviving BP criminal acts is where Pennsylvania is gona focus on in November – not the chanting of banal talking points and the hate cartooning on fox.
IMHO
(People should look up Issa’s sterling reputation and credentials to get a good look at who the R’s have on point for ethics issues now)
David Lewis
Jun 3rd, 2010
Mitchell, Sestak scandal please keep it up. Reps president’s didn’t do the same in the past right.
Joe didn’t take the deal and he won anyway so even if you thought it was dirty it doesn’t matter. It’s Pointless.
Blago your kidding right
And small business please. The govt for sure gave you great loans to start. And you ever care about I bet more tax breaks to go with it right. We tried that for 8 years. And still wages have stayed the same since the 80′s. And when was the last time you hired somebody buddy.
David Lewis
Jun 3rd, 2010
It seems like Meehan thinks that he can make by name reg and not rocking the boat. We knew more about the last guy that Ran against Joe a folow named Craig Williaws than this Guy.
David Lewis
Jun 3rd, 2010
Mitchell Arizona immigration law I bet that you hire them.
Go Flyers
Jun 4th, 2010
David Lewis-
Stop crying, I bet you are an illegal immigrant. Lets start to face facts, Barack Obama is a one term President. Its embarrassing that the White House can’t hold a simple press conference and answer all of the questions. Some transparency we have here right? That’s unfortunately what happens when you have a philosopher for a President, we need a leader. Tell Obama to leave Plato in his office and pick up a leadership for dummies book. His arrogance is egregious, if you don’t believe me watch the health care summit.