send to a friend | print | comment
Santorum comment ignites a clash in Senate race
Former Senator Rick Santorum has been putting out feelers for a possible presidential run, but it was something he said about ex-colleague Arlen Specter that made a splash over the weekend.
Appearing at the Southern Republican Leadership Conference in New Orleans, Santorum offered up a mea culpa for endorsing Specter in his tough 2004 race—and said he did so because Specter promised to back whoever President George W. Bush nominated to the Supreme Court.
“The reason I endorsed Arlen Specter is because we were going to have two Supreme Court nominees coming up,” Santorum said, according to The Washington Post. “I got a commitment from Arlen Specter that no matter who George W. Bush would nominate, he would support that nominee.”
That prompted an almost immediate attack from Specter’s primary rival Joe Sestak, a denial by Specter himself and, later, Santorum sticking by the claim.
“Rick Santorum’s stunning confirmation that Arlen Specter sold his influence as Chairman of the Judiciary Committee for a political endorsement should be extremely troubling to Pennsylvanians,” Sestak said in a statement Saturday evening. “There are few people in this nation who have a greater impact on the lives of the American people than the men and women who serve lifetime appointments on the Supreme Court. For Arlen Specter to take his marching orders from Rick Santorum and George W. Bush and pledge to support any nominee—no matter how partisan, no matter how unqualified—in order to win an election is a stunning betrayal of his duty as a public servant.”
Just an hour later, Specter issued his denial.
“I never made any promise to Senator Santorum about this,” Specter said. “I would never make a promise on a vote like this under any circumstances. I’m sorry his support for me has caused him trouble in his efforts for the Republican nomination for president. He’s had six years to make this charge and he hadn’t said anything about it.”
Later, Santorum spokeswoman Virginia Davis told PoliticsPA that her boss is sticking by his story.
“Senator Santorum stands firmly by the statement he made today about the commitment he received from Senator Specter in 2004 to support President Bush’s nominations to the Supreme Court,” Davis said. “And there was no better illustration of that commitment than Senator Specter’s ardent defense of both Justices Alito and Roberts during their confirmation hearings.”
April 11, 2010 at 2:44 pm
Tags: Arlen Specter, Joe Sestak, Rick Santorum













BB
Apr 11th, 2010
And we wonder why any of these three should be in any sort of political office “supposedly” serving their Pa. constituents? Enough already, please the the three of you, just go away. We need leaders in this country more than ever, not bureaucrats.
TB
Apr 11th, 2010
Anyone who is surpised by this revelation by Santorum is naïve. Specter cutting a deal with Santorum in 2004 was advantageous for both men and George W Bush. Santorum waiting six years to make hay of the matter when he is running for the presidency is expedient.
To the Republican base, chosing between a guy that endorsed Specter and a guy that passed comprehensive healthcare reform in Mass. must make them sick. The re-elect is going to be a victory similar to Johnson’s win in 64.
HateSestak
Apr 11th, 2010
First Representative Sestak makes unfounded accusations against the incumbent Democratic President of the United States, giving fodder to right-wing commentators and pundits. Now, Sestak echoes the sentiments of former Senator Rick Santorum, a reactionary Republican. And Sestak purports to be a Democrat?! Sestak, obviously, has no loyalty whatsoever to the Democratic Party, nor is he committed to any particular ideological agenda. Sestak is a self-serving, self-seeking demagogue who will do or say anything to further his own narrow interests. He is a charlatan – a political con man who has exploited his constituents to the hilt. But his short-lived career is coming to a close, and he will soon be bereft of any power or influence.
HateSestak
Apr 11th, 2010
TB: Very expedient indeed. Democrats should voice concern about these feeble attempts on the part of the GOP to interfere with the Democratic primary outcome. The GOP is quite dismayed by Sestak’s utter failure to capture support among prospective primary voters; they never imagined that Sestak would perform so miserably. The GOP assumed that Sestak would enjoy some success and exhaust Specter’s campaign resources. Instead, Specter has retained his staggering war chest, commands a 20% lead in public opinion polls, and will likely emerge from the primary with an overwhelming victory. And if Sestak fails to advertise, Specter will have an incredible fundraising advantage over Toomey – an insurmountable advantage, in fact. The GOP is alarmed, and with good reason.
The question that must be posed by Democrats is a simple, straightforward one: whose interests are being served by the Sestak campaign? If Sestak is genuinely committed to the Democratic Party, why does he appear to be undermining it at every turn?!
David Diano
Apr 11th, 2010
Well, it’s no surprise that Sestak would take Santorum’s word on anything, especially on a day when he’s hanging out with his pal, Pat Toomey. There’s an easy way to tell that Santorum wasn’t telling the truth: his head didn’t explode.
Of course, considering Sestak’s own politically motivated accusations against Obama for “deal making”, Sestak is hardly holds a worthwhile opinion on such matters.
Rob
Apr 11th, 2010
Specter is lying. He made the promise. Of that I have no doubt. He repeated the promise when after he was elected, the Republicans tried to strip him of his judiciary committee chairmanship.
Specter is not to be trusted.
David Diano
Apr 11th, 2010
Rob-
Who do you trust more: Specter or Santorum if they disagree?
Santorum and Bush backed Specter for ONE reason: they knew he could beat Hoeffel for the win. Period.
Santorum and Sestak can make all sorts of false claims about why Specter was supported by the GOP in 2004, but that’s the real reason.
It’s also the reason that Obama, Biden, Rendell, Casey, etc. are supporting Specter over Sestak: Specter has the best shot at winning. Period.
EK
Apr 12th, 2010
And he’ll regain his seniority which gives him the ability to generate more federal revenue for Pennsylvania, at least from Rendell’s and Casey’s perspectives. Let’s not forget that Specter only recently switched parties, and presumably shored up his support from the chief Democrats before doing so. They could have said no and let Sestak beat Toomey in the general… but they chose not to do that for several reasons, and this at a time when their political prospects were still high. Let’s be honest, none of us know whether Santorum was telling the truth (though Diano makes a good point about Specter being able to beat Hoeffel) and we can’t know what went through anyone else’s head either. This is all about political gamesmanship, and Specter’s one of the best out there at that.
George Maniatty
Apr 12th, 2010
David Diano and HateSestak are not trustworthy.
Rob
Apr 12th, 2010
Don’t kid yourselves. Obama is backing Specter only because of Biden and Rendell. Biden and Rendell are backing Specter because of years of mutual backscratching-they owe Specter big time for garbage that has nothing to do with sound public policy. There’s nothing more to that than personal loyalty. I believe that Rick Santorum is more credible than Specter. Specter would tell any lie at all if it furthered his objectives. Santorum is a right wing fool, but I have never known him to lie about anything.
DaveB
Apr 12th, 2010
Not exactly ‘stunning’ news: the only question is whether support for Specter in 2004 was purchased or extracted by blackmail
John
Apr 12th, 2010
Doesn’t surprise me one bit. Specter is a piece of human garbage. He has sold out the GOP, sold out his beliefs, and sold out the people of PA…all in hopes of being elected for a few more years. What scum!
Isaac L
Apr 12th, 2010
Wow, John, someone is beingmore than a little self righteous here. Republicans sold out Specter. The man has always been a moderate and moderates abandoned the Republican Party in 08. It’s a wonder he didn’t leave before he did.
The Democratic Party is the Big Tent party these days and guess who is shaping up to be the new Reagan. Here’s a hint: you probably think he was born in Kenya and his name rhymes with “no drama.”
David Diano
Apr 12th, 2010
Rob-
You haven’t known Santorum to lie? Well, then you haven’t been listening. Santorum was one of the few neocon holdouts claiming there was WMD in Iraq, long after Bush admitted there weren’t.
When the Intelligent Design case was going on in Dover, PA, Santorum was backing I.D. to the hilt…. until the Judge ruled that I.D. was really repackaged Creationism (from a Creationism textbook no less with some cut/paste of I.D. for God). Santorum had the audacity to claim that he had “no idea” the I.D. people were trying inject religion into the classroom.
Just type “Santorum lies” into Google sometime.
Isaac-
Exactly. In 2008, hundreds of thousands of GOP moderates in PA switched to the Democratic party, and didn’t go back to the increasingly radical right-wing GOP. Why does everyone act so shocked that Specter came over too?
Down to Earth
Apr 12th, 2010
Someone should tell Santorum to clean up his own house before he takes a shot at anyone…I fear for America if he runs for President, As, a Pittsburger, I have known this weak leek, who is lead around by the nose for the Party, since they put him in…Pray he doesn’t get in !
Brett
Apr 12th, 2010
Santorum equal Fascist
This guy will damage the country.
David Diano
Apr 13th, 2010
Rick is trying his best to help his buddy, Toomey, by trashing Specter, in hopes it helps Sestak become Toomey’s opponent.
Lefty
Apr 14th, 2010
Virginia Rick. Need I say more?