The Washington Post

pa2012.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it

In defeat for Lentz, judge’s ruling keeps Meehan on the ballot

In defeat for Lentz, judge’s ruling keeps Meehan on the ballot

Pat Meehan will be on the Republican primary ballot next month.

A state judge on Thursday tossed out parts of a challenge seeking to keep him off the ballot, making it impossible to prove in court that the former U.S. Attorney doesn’t have enough valid signatures to run in the 7th Congressional District. By Friday afternoon, the campaign of Meehan’s Democratic opponent, which spearheaded the challenge, had decided not to appeal the ruling by Commonwealth Court Judge Rochelle S. Friedman, largely ending a legal fight that began about three weeks ago.

It was a victory for the Meehan campaign and a loss for Democrat Bryan Lentz, whose campaign spent tens of thousands of dollars on the legal effort but now won’t get the chance to present its evidence in open court, thanks to what was essentially a technical ruling about the nature of the original complaint. Even after the 10-page ruling was issued, both sides jockeyed for political advantage, with Meehan’s campaign calling the entire ordeal a “charade” and Lentz’s campaign noting that Judge Friedman’s ruling didn’t address the full merits of the case.

An investigation into Meehan’s nominating petitions is still before the state attorney general’s office, but Lentz has called for a federal probe to avoid any conflict of interest.

“As we expected and maintained, the court has ruled that the Lentz challenge was unsupported and invalid,” Meehan campaign manager Bryan Kendro said in a statement. “All this charade has done is waste the time and resources of our court system in a disgraceful attempt to distract voters from the harsh economic realities we face and the flawed and failed policies being implemented in Washington.

“Bryan Lentz is not willing to run a campaign on the issues, or put his record up against Pat Meehan and it’s easy to understand why,” Kendro added. “As a prosecutor he never stood up to pay-to-play politics in Philadelphia and in Harrisburg he has supported a tax and spend agenda that has dug us deeper into economic despair. Pat Meehan has taken true political corruption head on by putting corrupt politicians in Harrisburg, Philadelphia, and the suburban region behind bars.”

In his own statement, Lentz campaign manager Vincent Rongione, who took to the blogosphere to raise questions about the case earlier this week, reiterated that a full criminal investigation is still needed.

“Though we will no longer pursue the election law case, the fact remains that today, the Meehan petitions on file with the Secretary of State still contain forgeries, false affidavits and other improper signatures,” Rongione said. “The Meehan campaign has cavalierly dismissed the extensive and inappropriate actions of the GOP political machine that supports him and has failed to offer any explanation as to the serious improprieties that took place under Meehan’s watch. We continue to believe that the citizens of the 7th Congressional District deserve a thorough explanation and a complete and independent criminal investigation to address these significant issues.”

In the end, Judge Friedman’s ruling centered on two issues. It shot down the argument that a circulator with one potentially faulty nominating petition should then have all of his or her petitions thrown out. And it rejected attempts to throw out signatures that Lentz’s supporters had argued weren’t properly notarized.

As Cliff Levine, a lawyer for Lentz’s supporters, said: “Meehan is now able to establish 1,000 signatures by default.”

Whether the ballot challenge provides any more political upside for Lentz remains to be seen, and could hinge almost entirely on whether and how any criminal investigation moves forward. At a minimum, Lentz succeeded in raising serious questions about how Delaware County Republican leaders circulate nominating petitions to get candidates on the ballot, and pieces of the evidence his campaign gathered have been independently verified by news organizations.

But at the same time, a candidate who was already expected to be outspent in one of the country’s most competitive House races has now spent a significant sum of money with little to show for it.

Asked about the expenditure of resources late last week, Rongione said: “It’s an important issue, and we felt a significant investment was warranted.”

Meehan is the sole Republican candidate on the ballot. A ballot challenge is still pending against one of Lentz’s Democratic opponents, with a hearing scheduled for next week.

share001btn In defeat for Lentz, judges ruling keeps Meehan on the ballot

April 9, 2010 at 7:34 pm

--Dan Hirschhorn

Tags: , ,

comments

comments [21] | post a comment

  1. P. O'Neill

    Apr 9th, 2010

    Lentz is nothing more than David Landau lite. These types of guys routinely get trounced by the voters and will do so again. So this whole thing ends and NOT ONE Republican signature is diqualified. Sheesh!

  2. Colleen Guiney

    Apr 9th, 2010

    Yes – even the blatant forgeries that have been discussed in the press and on this site seem to be perfectly acceptable to P O’Neill.
    I hope we see more sunlight on this issue in the coming weeks.

  3. huw

    Apr 9th, 2010

    my understanding is that there will be another court hearing on the rest of the complain, although that will not affect the overall outcome. It was extremely unlikely that Meehan would be thrown off the ballot anyway, but the case and the upcoming hearing will continue to paint Meehan as a Delco GOp insider with all the baggage that comes with. This looks like a political move rather than a legal one.

  4. Stosh

    Apr 9th, 2010

    No, there will not be another hearing. Lentz recognized his BS was not worth the paper it was written on and withdrew his complaint rather than risk sanctions and continued embarassment. That’s the issue with ballot challenges, you need to show the person doesn’t have 1,000 valid signatures. He couldn’t do it, so he made stuff up. His complaint was bogus. What a waste of taxpayer money.

    As for the forgeries, Pat Meehan asked authorities to investigation those and said the person responsible should be held accountable. Hopefully the AG will prosecute those who forged signatures.

  5. Dem Debacle

    Apr 9th, 2010

    Lentz loses in November and the GOP wins the seat. Thank you Nancy and Barack!

  6. flynnbw

    Apr 9th, 2010

    Mr. Meehan has shown his true colors during this whole incident. He’s a party insider who looks the other way when GOP machine politicians do his dirty work for him.

    I thought he was better than this, but I guess I was wrong.

  7. huw

    Apr 9th, 2010

    I doubt any of these candidates really care about the taxpayer. The question is whether the brouhaha and the expense was worth it for the Lentz campaign.
    They did succeed in tying Meehan to the Delco GOP and ending whatever efforts Meehan was making to portray himself as an independent voice in Delco. But that was a hard sell anyway. It’s an interesting election – a Dem running in a tough election environment against a Repub running essentially as the incumbent. The reverse of what’s going on around the nation.

  8. Stosh

    Apr 9th, 2010

    huw-

    Nice attempt at spinning this, but if anyone is running as the incumbent in this race, its clearly Lentz. He’s a sitting state legislator marred by the Bonusgate scandal who voted for Rendell’s budget and tax increases. Doesn’t bode well for him at all.

  9. sick of it all

    Apr 10th, 2010

    Meehan is a puppet and child of the machine and benefits by the election fraud perpretrated by the like of the political machine leaders. He has never run a campaign for office against a serious opponent. there is years of footage of him with gwb and specter…he also has photoops with perzel…this should be great to watch…and with the admissins of fraud already in the press by the Delco GOP operatives….

  10. David Diano

    Apr 10th, 2010

    Maybe if Lentz hadn’t wasted resources going after Conner and Touey, he would have had more time and money to focus on his legitimate case against Meehan.

    This is what happens when you take your eyes off the ball and distract yourself going after candidates who weren’t a threat. You let the real threat slip your grasp.

    While I feel the moves and what was uncovered against Meehan were absolutely brilliant, I also feel that it was absolutely foolhardy to waste precious campaign resources going after the Democratic primary opponents.

    The Lentz campaign showed an enormous amount of political muscle standing up to and catching Meehan and the Delco GOP red-handed in deliberate fraud.

    The point of the Judge’s ruling was that they cannot automatically rule out all the petitions notarized by a Notary connected with a bad Circulator in an aggregate fashion.

    However, the Judge DOES need to bring every Notary and Circulator into court, under oath, and ask them about their sworn signatures and the “inconsistencies”. If the Notaries violated their oaths, they should be dismissed as Notaries, and pay whatever fine/penalty there is. The circulators appear to have been engaged in willful voter fraud and deception. Smells criminal to me. Furthermore, Pat Meehan and his campaign staff should have to swear under oath to whatever prior knowledge or involvement they had.

    It will be fun to watch Meehan “plead the Fifth”.

    As for the Judge’s “aggregate” ruling, there is a way to get all the petitions in an aggregate fashion, if the Notaries and Circulators are forced to testify under oath. Ironically, on Feb 16th I outlined this EXACT aggregate scenario to Vince Rongione at the Delco Dem’s nominating convention. If Vince calls me, I’d be happy to remind him of what line of questioning (under oath) would permit an aggregate dismissal of the Petitions. (This assumes that they haven’t already closed that door with their approach and by prematurely conceding paragraphs 47-49 in a way that closes this loophole in the Judge’s reasoning.)

  11. K . Martel

    Apr 10th, 2010

    A correct ruling by a Democrat judge . I am surprised at Rep. Lentz . His arguments were ridiculous .

  12. Konins

    Apr 10th, 2010

    Anyone interested in looking at a sample of the evidence of wholesale fraud should go to the slideshow at the Lentz campaign website and see for themselves: http://votelentz.com/images/stories/meehanpetitions.pdf The assertion that this whole scandal is the work of one “overzealous” volunteer is just hogwash.

  13. md

    Apr 10th, 2010

    Dave,

    I think you are referring to the “Rizzo Doctrine” that has been upheld in court. I am told it has to do with the “reckless disregard for the process” which would allow for the wholesale dismissal of the petition.

    Throwing out notories because of the impropriety of a circulator was always a long shot argument. The notory’s job is just to attest and verify that the circulator or person doing the swearing is actually the person swearing that “blah, blah, blah is the case” not to verify the truthfulness of what is sworn. That is the argument that the judge threw out as invalid.

    Most experts also agree that the Fed’s do not have jurisdiction. I would persue a more winnable course of action… just saying.

  14. David Diano

    Apr 11th, 2010

    md-
    I wasn’t thinking of that.

    The only reason to throw out the Notaries would be if they didn’t observe the Circulators sign, backdated, notarized while stuff wasn’t all filled in, etc. However, under oath, the Notaries might be willing to “give up” the Circulators, rather than risk perjury (or rather further perjury if they falsified anything).
    But, removing in aggregate comes down to asking a special series of questions to paint them into a corner, the only escape from which is to lose the ballots.

    Of course, this will only work if Lentz’s campaign is correct about the frauds they’ve identified. If the Notaries and/or Circulators lie on even one question under oath, they would be cooked and lose the aggregate petitions.

  15. P. O'Neill

    Apr 11th, 2010

    The only “muscle” the Lentz campaign showed was leading you group of circle-jerkers who were running around shouting Machine” and “Criminal”! When the opportunity finally came for Lentz to look at those he accused and drag everyone into court, he spit the bit. He challenged Meehan to a fight and when the time came, he escpaed out the back door to go play with his dolls. David, huw and Colleen, you must be proud.

  16. Colleen Guiney

    Apr 11th, 2010

    P O’Neill-
    It still amazes me that folks are standing up for the Meehan team.
    Did any of you actually look at the evidence?

    http://votelentz.com/images/stories/meehanpetitions.pdf

    I senderely hope my covernment can be run more carefully and ethically that this petition submission.

  17. David Diano

    Apr 11th, 2010

    P O’Neill-
    We seems to have different reading on what happened. Meehan submitted about 3,600 signatures. The Lentz campaign withdrew when it appeared that the judge was going to allow the minimum number of 1,000 of those signatures.

    That does not negate the apparently willful and deliberate criminal behavior used for 2,000 of the signatures. That’s the “machine” you seem so eager to defend.

    The Lentz campaign should still pursue convictions for these people associated with the rampant violations. Meehan seems rather unconcerned with the criminal actions done on his behalf (hardly surprising considering his record of selective prosecution).

  18. BB

    Apr 11th, 2010

    Come on, did you really think Pat Meehan is any different than any politician? Please drop out of the race now.

  19. IwanttobeChinese

    Apr 11th, 2010

    Pat”The Rat” Meehan -your face is peeling and so is your (sic) reputation. Meehan represents EVERYTHING that is wrong with the political system. He has company though….Tom “Naked Gun” Corbett, Scott “Flow-bee” Cocklin, Rick “The Dick” Santorum, etc. Let’s stand tall and get rid of them all-they make this country and our state weak…

  20. warren

    Apr 12th, 2010

    The only people on the stand are going to be lentz and his folks when they have to testify in the defamation cases that are going to be brought.
    They called some good hardworking folks forgerers and they will have to answer for it. I’m not sure they thought that one through.

  21. Lana

    Apr 13th, 2010

    —————Being in the party for over 35 years I am not one bit surprised at the ruling. The GOP has always been the GOP and they are as corrected as all get out, I saw many of the petition and they were forged even a simple minded judge could see that. Forget these clowns now the people will get what they deserve in Delco. I know my pct in Upper Darby will vote for Lentz and so it goes. McNicol is a old corrupt man and always has been ! Can anyone prove different but he knows that the “times are a changing”

Leave a Reply


- will not be published