send to a friend | print | comment
Toomey: No on the jobs bill
Democrats asked, he answered—eventually.
Republican Senate candidate Pat Toomey said Thursday that he would not have voted for a jobs bill that recently passed the Senate, arguing that it will “do little to create new jobs.”
He took a stance after Democrats spent a couple days hammering him for not doing so. A couple hours before Toomey made his statement, the state Democratic Party had unveiled a so-called “Toomey Ticker” to measure the time it took for Toomey to make his position known.
“The so-called Hire Act contains a net tax increase, does not eliminate earmarks, and employs badly designed tax incentives that will do little to
create new jobs,” a Toomey spokeswoman said in a statement (hat-tip to The Morning Call). “Pat would have opposed this bill and replaced it with one that actually creates jobs. If Senator Specter and his new Democratic cronies are truly interested in job creation, they should stop supporting
the massive new taxes on businesses contained in the health care and cap-and-trade bills.”
Later, Democrats blasted Toomey for opposing the bill.
“I just find it incomprehensible—and, frankly, offensive—that Pat Toomey continues to play partisan politics with the lives of Pennsylvanians,” state party chairman T.J. Rooney said in a statement. “While Pat Toomey panders to his extreme right wing base, hundreds of thousands of Pennsylvanians are left wondering how they’re going to pay their bills this month.”
March 11, 2010 at 6:32 pm
Tags: Pat Toomey













Jake
Mar 11th, 2010
Good to see T.J. Rooney talking about Republicans, and not going after Democratic candidates in statewide and congressional primaries. He should keep it up. Time to start taking Corbett on, too. Let’s focus on the general, Mr. Chairman.
WESTPADEM6
Mar 11th, 2010
Damn those pheasants for wanting jobs! Who needs jobs when you’ve worked and stole for a while on Wall Street
BC
Mar 11th, 2010
GREAT! asshole.
Joe
Mar 11th, 2010
Yeah, what does that Toomey guy know about creating jobs anyway, he was only a successful entrepeneur! Just look at the bang up job Obama has done (unemployment higher than it has been in many years)and Arlen really knows alot about job creation too. (Ahhh, when did he last have a job in the private sector?)
HateSestak
Mar 11th, 2010
If unemployment benefits are not extended, countless people will likely be unable to meet their monthly obligations. Car payments. Mortgages. Credit card bills. Obviously, this would have a devastating impact on the overall economy of both the state and the nation. If people cannot meet their monthly obligations, the corporations that the GOP is beholden to will also suffer. This is not a complicated issue, and it is not an ideological or partisan issue. We have no choice. If benefits are not extended, both the unemployed AND the business community will suffer the consequences. Toomey are others must put ideological poppycock aside and deal with reality.
Shock & Awe
Mar 11th, 2010
“Yeah, what does that Toomey guy know about creating jobs anyway, he was only a successful entrepeneur! ”
–if that is what you call a nuisance bar owner…
David Diano
Mar 12th, 2010
Wow. A conservative Republican saying “No” to a jobs bill.
I’m also “shocked” to find gambling going on in Rick’s bar.
John
Mar 12th, 2010
I agree with David. If tarp, the bailouts, and the simulus all failed then we must come to one simple conclusion….they weren’t funded enough! We need to simply spend MORE MORE MORE! This isn’t the time for debate, this is the time for spending baby! We shouldn’t be concerned with debt. We’ll just raise the taxes on some rich white people. They’ll pay for all this.
Bob Guzzardi
Mar 12th, 2010
Who pays for all the spending? The Forgotten Taxpayer, the productive person, who works, saves and invests, the job creating small business person. The Liberals advocate taking money from the productive and subsidizing the unproductive. Has The Forgotten Taxpayer, the small business person, the investor done anything wrong that he and she should have their resources taken from them by government fiat?
The Democrats are getting rich from government and, disingenuously, claiming to be for “the little guy”. Cut payroll taxes, reduce the cost of hiring new workers, with a simple and non bureaucratic tax cut, and jobs will appear. The best job training is a job and work is good for the working person who would rather work, contribute and be independent than be beholden to political class.
David Diano
Mar 12th, 2010
John-
Nice sarcasm. However, the stimulus bill did work. You don’t believe me? Just ask all the GOP congressmen who touted the success as they posed for pictures with over-sized novelty checks in their districts.
We were looking at complete economic collapse. Look at the monthly rate of job loss, the stock markets, and other indicators compared to a year ago.
Bob-
Under Bush, the rich got the biggest tax break in history and the poor and middle class suffered. The rich aren’t paying their share. The “cut taxes” mantra doesn’t generate the revenue to run the government, build roads, support the military, etc.
A 5%-10% tax increase on the rich isn’t going to stop them from paying their rent/mortgage, dining out, sending their kids to college, buying a car, etc. But, it will reduce the burden on the poor and middle class.
If you want to reduce the payroll taxes, fine, but you have to make up for that loss with increases on the rich.
Ed H.
Mar 13th, 2010
This whole thread is a good justification for never giving any control over the economy to conservatives. They should spend a few years studying the Keynesian economics that have been used successfully for over 70 years and have only faltered once the conservatives started meddling by putting “market” based reforms into it to bring the economy to the pinnacle of failure under the Bush/GOP led years.