The Washington Post

pa2012.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it

Dems blast Toomey’s silence on jobs bill

Dems blast Toomey’s silence on jobs bill

Republican Senate candidate Pat Toomey hasn’t yet taken a position on the jobs bill that passed the Senate a couple weeks ago—and Democrats think it’s about time to do so.

Both Senator Arlen Specter and the state Democratic Party criticized Toomey this week for his apparent silence. Specter wrote to Toomey, urging him to “stand up for Pennsylvania’s working families and support this legislation, or explain why you won’t help our economy at a time when it is needed.”

“With our economy still struggling to return to prosperity, unemployment fluctuating around 9.7 percent our government cannot stand idly by and let families and businesses who are in need suffer.” Specter wrote.

Meanwhile, the state party called his “refusal to take a position” on the bill “typical of a candidate more concerned with political posturing than he is with making real choices about getting Pennsylvanians back to work.”

“While Pat Toomey pays campaign trail lip service to the merits of cutting payroll taxes,” state party spokesman Patrick McKenna said, “he is suddenly unable to muster an opinion on a bill containing the same tax cuts he says he supports. Pennsylvanians eagerly await your decision Mr. Toomey.”

A Toomey spokeswoman didn’t shed much light on the subject. In an e-mail, she wrote that “when it comes to ‘jobs bills; from Washington, there are three approaches facing Pennsylvania voters. There’s Joe Sestak, who thinks jobs are created by more Washington spending. There’s Pat Toomey, who knows jobs are created by small businesses and entrepreneurs who are encouraged by lower tax rates rather than more Washington spending. And there’s Arlen Specter,  who only cares about one job—his own.”

But when asked directly whether Toomey would have voted for the bill or against, she didn’t respond.

share001btn Dems blast Toomeys silence on jobs bill

March 11, 2010 at 9:29 am

--pa2010.com Staff

Tags: ,

comments

comments [17] | post a comment

  1. Jim

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Grandpa Arlen is too senile to realize that the first stimulus didn’t work, so he then backs a “jobs bill” hoping that it does what the stimulus was supposed to do a year ago…create jobs. What a farse. Gov’t is clearly broken and Arlen is a symbol of everything wrong with it. I can’t wait for Toomey to sign Arlen’s commitment papers and send him off to the old folks home for good.

  2. Ed H.

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Toomey’s. Wall Street guy, and a conservative one at that, which seems to translate into his being a short term thinker on economics instead of someone who is willing to work towards long term growth in the economy. His job at the Club for Growth shows that he’s got the Golf Course Republican talking points on government spending and taxes down pat, but he’s light on substance when it comes to the economy and jobs creation.

  3. Bruce Bailey

    Mar 11th, 2010

    I think it would be an awful shame if we had to re-elect Arlen as a fake Democrat. But even this frail, 80 year old senior citizen would make mincemeat out of empty-headed Teabagger Toomey.

    And with Sestak as the candidate, this race could be over by Labor Day.

  4. Joe Collins

    Mar 11th, 2010

    (1) The payroll tax cut in the “jobs” bill is not the same as the one Toomey wants. I believe Toomey would like an across the board payroll tax reduction. The one in the bill is only for new hires who have been out of work >60 days, which is rather arbitrary and pretty distortive on the hiring process.

    (2) Just because a payroll tax cut (even an imperfect one) is in the bill doesn’t mean the rest of the bill doesn’t stink to high heaven.

  5. HateSestak

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Bruce Bailey: Yesterday, according to The New York Times, House Democratic leaders banned budget earmarks to private industry, “ending a practice that has steered billions of dollars in no-bid contracts to companies and set off corruption scandals.” Your beloved Representative Sestak is among those who have engaged in this deplorable practice. For example, in 2008, defense contractor Dragonfly Pictures received an $800,000.00 earmark courtesy of Representative Sestak. Since then, Sestak has been the recipient of over $16,000.00 in contributions from Dragonfly Pictures (indeed, this firm has become his 3rd largest contributor).

    Representative Sestak does not serve the interests of the common man – he advances the interests of labor racketeers, defense contractors, and other disreputable characters.

  6. HateSestak

    Mar 11th, 2010

    For those of you who are interested in Representative Sestak’s subservience to Dragonfly Pictures, visit Legistorm.com, Opensecrets.org and other notable sites.

  7. Isaac L.

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Surprise! Toomey sent his spokesperson to dodge the question. I really thought he was going to be a straight shooter, but it seems like “the principled choice” isn’t as principled as he’d have us believe.

  8. Bruce Bailey

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Or better yet, look on Sestak’s website, where he documents his request for Dragonfly, which is developing helicopter simulation software: http://tinyurl.com/ycf6van

    Individuals donate to campaigns, businesses don’t.

    Another smear. So many already and we’re still two months away from the primary. Old habits die hard, I guess, especially when you’ve been a Republican for as long as Specter has.

  9. EK

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Toomey’s principled, it’s just difficult to take a stand against something being called a “Jobs” bill, much as it was difficult for Dems to vote against the Patriot Act. Regardless of the truth, they’re touting this as a jobs bill. Therefore a voice against it would be considered a voice against jobs. Obviously, anyone with an economics background knows how absurd this is… but anyone with a strong politics background can see the chess board more clearly.

  10. HateSestak

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Bailey: Toomey would annihilate Representative Sestak in the Fall. Sestak’s resources would be all but exhausted after a prolonged primary battle with the venerable Senator Specter. Sestak would not enjoy the support of any major players in the Democratic Party, in PA or DC. Most importantly, however, Tommey would exploit Representative Sestak’s ongoing legal troubles. Toomey is well aware that Sestak is under investigation by federal authorities, and will make use of that info if/when it becomes necessary.

    Of course, it is a moot point. Representative Sestak’s prospects for victory in this primary are non-existent. Pivotal campaign staffers (including his Political Director and Communications Director) abandoned Sestak’s Senate bid weeks ago because they recognized that a Sestak victory was an impossibility. Sestak’s effort has become a unprecedented fiasco – a failure of epic proportions.

  11. Bruce Bailey

    Mar 11th, 2010

    The only place that Joe Sestak has “ongoing legal troubles” is in your very fevered imagination.

    Again, let’s review the PA Senate primary in (if you’ll excuse the expression) a nutshell:

    Sestak: Real Democrat.
    Specter: Fake Democrat.

    Sestak: 30 year record in US Navy, ending service as Admiral.
    Specter: 30 record as Republican, supported Scalia, Thomas, Roberts on Supreme Court and Reagan, Bush I and Bush II in the White House.

    Sestak: Vibrant 58 year old Congressman.
    Specter: Sickly, frail 80 year old Senator.

    Again repeating: If Sestak is the candidate, Teabag Toomey is toast by Labor Day.

  12. HateSestak

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Bruce Bailey: Why, I wonder, did Sestak’s Political Director, his Communications Director, and his Media Director – all of whom relinquished their positions weeks ago – not share your enthusiasm for his candidacy? If Representative Sestak’s prospects are so bright, why did these pivotal staffers abruptly abandon him? If Representative Sestak’s appeal is so formidable, why does he continue to lag behind his opponent in every public opinion poll? The empirical facts suggest that Representative Sestak’s candidacy is a washout, Bruce.

    Of course, the empirical facts tend to be ignored altoegther by Sestak’s few remaining supporters. The aforementioned Mr. Bailey, by way of illustration. Does Mr. Bailey care to explain why UFCW Local 1776 President Wendell Young IV, who nominated Representative Sestak at a major Democratic Party event, and formally endorsed him recently, has never contributed ANY funds to Sestak for Congress or Sestak for Senate? Perhaps Mr. Bailey doesn’t care to know…but the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) does.

  13. HateSestak

    Mar 11th, 2010

    By the Way Bailey: You might want to pay a visit to Opensecrets.org and other sites as I suggested. You will discover (no doubt to your consternation) that the information provided concerning contributions To Sestak from exceutives at Dragonfly Pictures is accurate. Frustrating when the empirical facts don’t jibe with your perceptions, is it not?

  14. WESTPADEM6

    Mar 11th, 2010

    Bruce-

    if sestak is the candidate the only “toast” we’ll see at labor day is Toomey having a toast at the country club in laughter over his 20 point lead over no show joe.

  15. HateSestak

    Mar 11th, 2010

    My God – I was just perusing the various allegations leveled against Representative Massa in The Atlantic. Massa appears to have been a dissolute, degenerate sexual predator his entire adult life! He apparently groped every male he ever encountered in the U.S. Navy! And Representative Sestak received an endorsement from this morally depraved monster? This man is a long-standing friend of Representative Sestak?!

    Earmarks to private companies like Dragonfly Pictures. Endorsements from closeted homosexual perverts. Close ties to known labor racketeers. Abysmal poll numbers. Every key campaign staff member resigning. Minimum wage payments to remaining staff members. Does anyone TRULY believe that Representative Sestak is a viable candidate for the U.S. Senate?!

  16. 95 South

    Mar 11th, 2010

    The Liberal Democrats, who have the majority in the House AND the Senate, have been talking for over a year now, and NOTHING is getting done, Unemployment is UP, the debt is UP, consumer confidence is DOWN, and lastly, not one friggin democrat, is stepping up to defend the position and primacy of the dollar.

    Toomey in a romp!

  17. Ed H.

    Mar 12th, 2010

    The guy repeating BS stories about Wendell Young and Sestak is making himself out to be a political troofer of sorts. Break out the straight jacket for the guy wrapped in tin foil…

Leave a Reply


- will not be published