<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: It&#8217;s time for single-payer health care in Pa.</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/</link> <description>Your destination for PA&#039;s Big 2012 Election Races</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Heather</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-14760</link> <dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:12:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-14760</guid> <description>This seems contradictory to me.  We are told by Democrats that competition lowers health care costs, but these same Democrats want a single payer system?So a monopoly is OK, so long as it is the goverment?  What happens when the goverment has a something the people pay for and they decide they need money somewhere else?They will raise the cost of health care premiums, as a revenue source!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems contradictory to me.  We are told by Democrats that competition lowers health care costs, but these same Democrats want a single payer system?</p><p>So a monopoly is OK, so long as it is the goverment?  What happens when the goverment has a something the people pay for and they decide they need money somewhere else?</p><p>They will raise the cost of health care premiums, as a revenue source!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Single Payer And Jobs &#171; MainLine Peace Action</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-13930</link> <dc:creator>Single Payer And Jobs &#171; MainLine Peace Action</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:20:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-13930</guid> <description>[...] Posted By Cindy Purvis On February 16, 2010 @ 7:00 am In Opinion, Voices &#124; 17 Comments [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted By Cindy Purvis On February 16, 2010 @ 7:00 am In Opinion, Voices | 17 Comments [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Eamonn Coughlan</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-12220</link> <dc:creator>Eamonn Coughlan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:29:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-12220</guid> <description>The point about a government take over of health care is I belive in error. We are talking about a public funded/private delivered system. Let Blue Shield administer it, who cares ! If such a plan is in place, I believe job creation will explode, will employees who are now unyoked from health care expand I think so.The US is already becoming uncompetative in the market place because of our employer based health care system. The savings are huge, what about auto insurance , would you need a medica clause ? Why, you are already covered for life ! Single payer is the &quot;only way to go, without it the cost of health care will cause our economy to implode.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point about a government take over of health care is I belive in error. We are talking about a public funded/private delivered system. Let Blue Shield administer it, who cares ! If such a plan is in place, I believe job creation will explode, will employees who are now unyoked from health care expand I think so.The US is already becoming uncompetative in the market place because of our employer based health care system. The savings are huge, what about auto insurance , would you need a medica clause ? Why, you are already covered for life ! Single payer is the &#8220;only way to go, without it the cost of health care will cause our economy to implode.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Carl Wagner</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-11357</link> <dc:creator>Carl Wagner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:24:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-11357</guid> <description>I would like to start by saying my tone of voice is calm and I am neither Republican or Democrat - I am Independent and like (dis-like) members of both parties.It is funny how people are so politically charged that they do not investigate the facts. The Single Payer Model is in effect and proven over many years to be effective as well as economical.We do not need to go over Economics 101 - when there is proof over the many years of Medicare&#039;s existence. This is NOT socialized medicine - quite the opposite. You have more choices of Doctors and treatment - not less.Out of the options from the Dems, and the options from the Reps, HR-676, HB 1660 &amp; SB 400 is the most logical type of option(s). I support HR-676. From a business mans perspective - cutting the admin cost from the current 25% down to (Medicare Proven) 2-3% admin cost - ALONE, that speaks volumes. Not to mention the CEO salaries wont have to be paid - that equates to millions of lost health care dollars to be used to help people &amp; fund the system.Even if my taxes were increased $7000-$10000 per year - I would be better off (I pay my own insurance - not company paid). We are only talking a modest increase in tax and no more out of pocket expenses - I see it as a wash.Take some time to view the many articles and videos on Single Payer Plans - and get involved by signing petitions.The Democratic Plan on the table now will be costly to say the least, and the Republican options are limited to people that can actually pay for insurance.When people do not have jobs (10% average in America) and the choice is food, shelter or insurance - I guess you can see which they would choose first.For those whom believe Single Payer is socialized medicine - better that (which it&#039;s not) than Fascism (which it is now).By the way - I work with Doctors everyday - Doctors have the least amount of headaches with Medicare. Many of them are in favor of Single Payer - it make billing easier.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to start by saying my tone of voice is calm and I am neither Republican or Democrat &#8211; I am Independent and like (dis-like) members of both parties.</p><p>It is funny how people are so politically charged that they do not investigate the facts. The Single Payer Model is in effect and proven over many years to be effective as well as economical.</p><p>We do not need to go over Economics 101 &#8211; when there is proof over the many years of Medicare&#8217;s existence. This is NOT socialized medicine &#8211; quite the opposite. You have more choices of Doctors and treatment &#8211; not less.</p><p>Out of the options from the Dems, and the options from the Reps, HR-676, HB 1660 &amp; SB 400 is the most logical type of option(s). I support HR-676. From a business mans perspective &#8211; cutting the admin cost from the current 25% down to (Medicare Proven) 2-3% admin cost &#8211; ALONE, that speaks volumes. Not to mention the CEO salaries wont have to be paid &#8211; that equates to millions of lost health care dollars to be used to help people &amp; fund the system.</p><p>Even if my taxes were increased $7000-$10000 per year &#8211; I would be better off (I pay my own insurance &#8211; not company paid). We are only talking a modest increase in tax and no more out of pocket expenses &#8211; I see it as a wash.</p><p>Take some time to view the many articles and videos on Single Payer Plans &#8211; and get involved by signing petitions.</p><p>The Democratic Plan on the table now will be costly to say the least, and the Republican options are limited to people that can actually pay for insurance.</p><p>When people do not have jobs (10% average in America) and the choice is food, shelter or insurance &#8211; I guess you can see which they would choose first.</p><p>For those whom believe Single Payer is socialized medicine &#8211; better that (which it&#8217;s not) than Fascism (which it is now).</p><p>By the way &#8211; I work with Doctors everyday &#8211; Doctors have the least amount of headaches with Medicare. Many of them are in favor of Single Payer &#8211; it make billing easier.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sid from va</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-10673</link> <dc:creator>sid from va</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 23:47:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-10673</guid> <description>cindy, good to see you fighting for what you believe in. best of luck.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cindy, good to see you fighting for what you believe in. best of luck.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guido</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-10507</link> <dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:09:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-10507</guid> <description>Hey Cindy-poo....Who will be the toll collector???Gotcha!!!Toll collectors are paid quite well in the Keystone State....and there DUI bosses have private drivers I understand.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Cindy-poo&#8230;.</p><p>Who will be the toll collector???</p><p>Gotcha!!!</p><p>Toll collectors are paid quite well in the Keystone State&#8230;.and there DUI bosses have private drivers I understand.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cindy Purvis</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-10440</link> <dc:creator>Cindy Purvis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:44:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-10440</guid> <description>Rightgirlinbucks,Under this single payer legislation the doctors would not become employees of the state. Neither would any other medical professional. We are just removing the toll booth (the insurance industry) that stand between us and our docs with their hand out. We now will have frredome to choose our own care. We now will no longer subsidize a useless industry. We have 4 docs on our board of directors. You can get more info at www.healthcare4allpa.org</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rightgirlinbucks,</p><p>Under this single payer legislation the doctors would not become employees of the state. Neither would any other medical professional. We are just removing the toll booth (the insurance industry) that stand between us and our docs with their hand out. We now will have frredome to choose our own care. We now will no longer subsidize a useless industry. We have 4 docs on our board of directors. You can get more info at <a
href="http://www.healthcare4allpa.org" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcare4allpa.org','http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcare4allpa.org')" rel="nofollow">http://www.healthcare4allpa.org</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guido</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-10378</link> <dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-10378</guid> <description>Hey contactsport...sounds like you are describing the insurance industry as the perfect metaphor for big government....so give big government oversight on what you quote as corrupt practices.....like stuffing crack pipes for crack addicts.....are you and Greg channeling Lenin...?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey contactsport&#8230;sounds like you are describing the insurance industry as the perfect metaphor for big government&#8230;.so give big government oversight on what you quote as corrupt practices&#8230;..like stuffing crack pipes for crack addicts&#8230;..are you and Greg channeling Lenin&#8230;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Guido</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-10377</link> <dc:creator>Guido</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:47:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-10377</guid> <description>Greggy....you need some Sowell brother..read any Thomas Sowell book ...start with &#039;Basic Economics&#039;....I believe Communist Russia had a single payer system...how did that turn outGreg? Sounds like you&#039;re a fan of central planning....Hey Greg...think about this question...deeply now....Who does government compete with on an &#039;equal playing field&#039; (key words Greg) in a free market system? don&#039;t hurt yourself now...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greggy&#8230;.you need some Sowell brother..read any Thomas Sowell book &#8230;start with &#8216;Basic Economics&#8217;&#8230;.I believe Communist Russia had a single payer system&#8230;how did that turn outGreg? Sounds like you&#8217;re a fan of central planning&#8230;.</p><p>Hey Greg&#8230;think about this question&#8230;deeply now&#8230;.Who does government compete with on an &#8216;equal playing field&#8217; (key words Greg) in a free market system? don&#8217;t hurt yourself now&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: contactsport</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2010/02/its-time-for-single-payer-health-care-in-pa/comment-page-1/#comment-10358</link> <dc:creator>contactsport</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:02:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5988#comment-10358</guid> <description>Recently I read that Highmark BCBS is resisting investigations into their practices by our PA State Insurance Department-there are NO checks and balances or restraints of spending by the Insurance Industry-they spend 25% of our premium dollars on lobbyists, advertising, CEO salaries and bonuses and only care about NOT paying doctors for treatment rendered. Doctors know the drill, and have learned to live with it, but the rest of us know the cost, to our lives and personal financial insecurity. Government can run things properly if we get the special interests out of the process in the making of rules-that is where things get muddled up. Check out www.healthcare4allpa.org to learn the facts, and then discuss your objections intelligently. As Cindy points out, this will be JOBS JOBS JOBS because employers will quickly figure out that 10% of payroll is a lot less than the 25-30% of payroll they are currently paying, and will move into PA and bring their jobs with them. That is Economics 101</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I read that Highmark BCBS is resisting investigations into their practices by our PA State Insurance Department-there are NO checks and balances or restraints of spending by the Insurance Industry-they spend 25% of our premium dollars on lobbyists, advertising, CEO salaries and bonuses and only care about NOT paying doctors for treatment rendered. Doctors know the drill, and have learned to live with it, but the rest of us know the cost, to our lives and personal financial insecurity. Government can run things properly if we get the special interests out of the process in the making of rules-that is where things get muddled up. Check out <a
href="http://www.healthcare4allpa.org" onclick="return TrackClick('http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcare4allpa.org','http%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthcare4allpa.org')" rel="nofollow">http://www.healthcare4allpa.org</a> to learn the facts, and then discuss your objections intelligently. As Cindy points out, this will be JOBS JOBS JOBS because employers will quickly figure out that 10% of payroll is a lot less than the 25-30% of payroll they are currently paying, and will move into PA and bring their jobs with them. That is Economics 101</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 543/544 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.pa2012.com @ 2012-02-12 01:50:41 -->
