send to a friend | print | comment
As chatter of an Onorato-Doherty ticket builds, a Saidel ally is ready to fight
At first, it seemed like nothing more than innocent speculation. A couple stories and columns mentioned that Scranton Mayor Chris Doherty could join Allegheny County Executive Dan Onorato on a Democratic ticket for governor. Those pieces didn’t mention former Philadelphia City Controller Jonathan Saidel, who had been preparing a campaign for Lieutenant Governor for well over a year. And Marty Marks, a spokesman and strategist for Saidel, didn’t like that.
So he called up seemingly every political reporter in the state, with a warning to anyone who might be thinking of trying to cut his candidate out of the mix that they shouldn’t even try it. “There’s really no room at the inn,” he said.
But behind the political theater and chatter, there’s something real going on. Multiple Democrats familiar with the situation confirmed to pa2010.com that Democrats as high as Gov. Ed Rendell have been discussing the possibility of Doherty, who’s running for governor, taking the bottom spot on the ticket instead, complementing Onorato in what many believe would be a potent combination. By most accounts, these discussions have neither been initiated by, nor do they even involve, the candidates themselves. Aides to both Onorato and Doherty say they’re focused on the Governor’s Mansion and nothing else.
Still, the high-level discussions underscore that some party leaders are looking to make the primary as painless as possible, acutely concerned that the political climate doesn’t favor them going into the November election. But if they try and push Saidel out of the way, they’ll have another political headache on their hands. Democrats familiar with the situation say that Congressman Bob Brady (D-1), the chairman of the Philadelphia Democratic Party and a longtime friend to Saidel, is ready to go to war for him if necessary.
In a recent interview, state party chairman T.J. Rooney declined to talk about any specific discussions going on behind the scenes. But he seemed to confirm that they’re happening.
“My job and the job of the governor as leader of our party,” Rooney said, “is to at least explore the possibility of saving our punch for when it counts, and that’s in the general, not the primary. It is no secret that conversations take place every day, in every state, in every party, to try and figure out ways to win. If I didn’t have these conversations, if we didn’t explore the possibility of avoding a divisive primary, I’d be guilty of political malpractice.
“I’ve never advocated for any candidate seeking the nomination for governor to withdraw,” he added. “I have pointed out where the race is, what the lay of the land is, and whether it would be possible to not have blood let in a primary.”
It may be too late to make a move. Saidel, a skilled campaigner by all accounts, has already raised more money than some top-ticket gubernatorial candidates, including Doherty. He’s racked up labor endorsements across the state. And his campaign says it will have the votes to win the party’s endorsement when state committee members meet in Lancaster this weekend, an assertion some party insiders say isn’t far from the truth. Rooney himself acknowledged that “Jonathan has tremendous support among the rank and file members of the party, make no mistake about it. He’s really worked this.”
And then there’s the matter of Brady. Though many see his power on the wane, he undoubtedly holds sway over a vast amount of the political infrastructure in Philadelphia. Local Democrats describe his relationship with Saidel as intensely close, both politically and personally. And after Brady nudged Saidel out of the 2007 mayoral race and ran himself (explanations for why he did so differ), he’s said to loathe the thought of pushing his friend aside again. When rumors that the governor was looking for an alternative candidate picked up steam, Brady quickly put together a meeting of the city’s ward leaders, who endorsed Saidel only hours before he formally declared his candidacy.
“He is going to do whatever he can,” one Democratic insider said of Brady. “He is going to fall on his sword for Saidel. I can’t see him cutting a deal with anyone here. … Brady loves Jonathan Saidel.”
Asked about the situation after Saidel’s recent announcement, Brady, who emceed the event himself, passed on the chance to talk about it.
“We hear all kinds of rumors,” he said.
It can’t be a pleasant turn of events for Saidel. By his telling, it was Rendell who encouraged him to run in the first place—though the governor isn’t known for discouraging anyone against running for anything. The campaign says its assuming Rendell is behind Saidel, and that all the chatter will eventually go nowhere because he’s the best candidate.
“It’s not just not going to come to pass,” Marks said. “No serious Democratic leader in the state is going to try to put a ticket together without Jonathan Saidel.”
But Rendell and Rooney alike are said to have a growing political infatuation with Doherty. As a Casey-style Democrat from Scranton, his value to a Democratic ticket would be formidable. Whether Brady could run up high enough margins for Saidel in Philadelphia against the governor’s wishes would be a test of his remaining clout.
No matter what happens, Saidel says he’s not going anywhere unless he loses in the May primary, which he quickly—and correctly—points out is a separate election.
“It doesn’t matter if they want me or not,” he said, adding that “I think it’d be foolish for anyone to jump in at this point and think things are going to change.”
One factor motivating the governor and others in their deliberations could be a perception that Saidel has, as one Democrat put it, “baggage.” For all his skill as a campaigner, he can be seen as embodying the city’s political establishment, in a decidedly anti-establishment climate. And though he is widely credited with greatly expanding the profile of the City Controller’s office during his long tenure, in late 1998 his girlfriend was charged with stealing money from his campaign. The charges were eventually thrown out and Saidel was never charged. But with a candidate for Lieutenant Governor having the primary campaign job of not being a liability, the prospect of the incident being brought back to life makes some Democrats queasy. Even in today’s charged political climate, a 12-year-old episode that went nowhere might not have much punch, but Democrats have little margin for error this year.
If there’s one thing on which Onorato and Doherty agree, it’s that neither of them wants to shift the focus from their own campaigns.
“It’s flattering,” Doherty spokesman Mark Nevins said of the speculation. “We take it as a compliment when people talk about the benefit of Chris Doherty being on a ticket. I think it means people recognize that he’s got a record of accomplishment. … We are committed to running for governor.”
Onorato spokesman Brian Herman said: “We’re focused on the governor’s race right now, and that’s the only race we’re focused on.”
February 1, 2010 at 7:40 pm
Tags: Bob Brady, Chris Doherty, Dan Onorato, Ed Rendell, Jonathan Saidel, Lt. Gov., T.J. Rooney













GOPHAWK
Feb 1st, 2010
I utterly fail to see how having Ed Rendell put together a marriage of Doherty and Onorato is a good message to the public that change is on the way. Neither one of these guys has ever run statewide.
One guy spent $600 million for a one mile tunnel to serve 900 people a day. The other guy is the titular mayor of an adult supervised Act 46 city. This is a political package that says to voters that Rendell has done so well that we would like to continue to provide you leaders of places like Philadelphia, Scranton and Pittsburgh which are oustanding examples of Act 47 financially strapped, job deprived and declining cities.
All three cities are bankrupt because they are paying the price for politics as usual. The state is going the same way and the public knows it.
Philadelphia and Alleghenhy Counties each lost twenty thousand jobs last year alone! That is twenty percent of all jobs lost in the state.
Our prosecutor will feast on these lambs!
More Doherty Lt Gov rumors - Early Returns - post-gazette.com
Feb 1st, 2010
[...] says that could be good for Joe Hoeffel (as well as Onorato), and from Pa2010, which talks about the pushback from current Democratic Lt. Gov. candidate Jonathan [...]
Jared Klein
Feb 1st, 2010
Great story…personally I would love to see Saidel pushed out of the race. He is a prime example of the Philly’s smoke filled backroom style of politics – the exact opposite of what the public is looking for.
From what I saw during the Progressive Summit, Onoarto is going to need some serious help to garner the support of progressives, and someone to counteract is abrasive personality. Adding Doherty, who espouses more progressive positions, could help Onorato get through the primary.
Of course, if I had my way, Hoeffel would be the nominee for Governor with Onorato as Lt. Gov – but we cant all get what we want.
David Diano
Feb 1st, 2010
Onorato certainly needs political cover on the social issues. However, I think having Doherty would turn out well for Hoeffel, as that would leave two western PA conservatives vs one eastern progressive in the race for the top spot.
Chris is an up-and-comer in the party. This is his year to get introduced to the party. I expect future election cycles will see him doing very well.
GOPHAWK
Feb 1st, 2010
Jared … do you get the irony: calling Saidel a prime example of the Philadelphia backroom in a story about how Philadelphian Ed Rendell is doing a new backroom deal to help his backroom buddy boy Onorato to keep Ed’s older backroom deals with others going forward.
David … I don’t think you would want your logic about Doherty in this post applied to your other up and comer who is just getting introduced to the party this year!
Jeanine
Feb 1st, 2010
Wagner-Doherty or Doherty-Wagner sounds better to me…Onorato has failed nominee written all over him.
Even if Doherty loses the gubernatorial primary and isn’t the LG nominee, he’s the frontrunner for Auditor General in two years.
David Diano
Feb 1st, 2010
What other up-and-comer?
I hope you aren’t referring to Sestak. His star (or rather stars) are on the decline. More and more people I meet know his reputation and how he’s not a good party Democrat and how he won’t work with people.
Some people think he’s positioning himself for future office, but he’s really just ending his political career. Oh, sure, there’s the chance we get a Dem governor, and Specter is unable it complete his term, and a replacement is needed. Sestak’s name will come up on the short list, but if Onorato is Rendell’s man, then we know it’s Rendell’s if he wants it.
The chain of events to put Sestak in higher office are limited. There are only 3 jobs bigger than congressman: senator, governor and president.
Aside from trying to fill Specter’s seat, Sestak has no shot at any of these. He certainly can’t primary Casey.
If Meehan wins, Sestak could come back in two years to take the seat back, but I can’t see him wanting that. If Meehan loses, no one will accept Sestak coming back in two years to primary an incumbent Dem.
My guess is that Joe will lose the primary, be of ZERO help in the general, unless it’s to kiss the @ss of the Dem governor’s candidate on the off-change of an appointment. He’ll have “senior-itis” for his last months in congress, as he concentrates on his next career move.
My guess is that he winds up working for some military contractor.
Anonymous
Feb 1st, 2010
Great piece. Thanks for putting this together.
James
Feb 1st, 2010
Nice story. Pretty funny if Hoeffel was angling for the number 2 spot himself and waited too long. No one I talk to thinks Joe is ever going to be up to the top spot, He’s too far to the left and, well, just not that bright.
GOPHAWK
Feb 1st, 2010
David, I was joking about turning your phrases to your newly minted Democrat who may be old in service years but new to his party! This wrinkly faced young pup is showing some leg to his new party this time around judging from the Progressive Summit!
As chatter of an Onorato-Doherty ticket builds, a Saidel ally is ready to fight… | GrassrootsPA
Feb 1st, 2010
[...] As chatter of an Onorato-Doherty ticket builds, a Saidel ally is ready to fight… [...]
Dan
Feb 1st, 2010
What great geniuses our commonwealth yields; like weeny boy Mayor Chris(tina) Doherty professional loser of a city that has 72,000 people:
1 He raised taxes
2 Increased the deficit
3 Allowed crime to increase
4 Brought in thousands of illegal aliens,
5 Wasted tax payer money
6 Ran out existing businesses
7 Stopped new businesses from starting up
8 Had the streets in Greenridge plowed while Southside was a nightmare
9 Appointed cronies to key positions, and they did nothing when they were there
10 Ran for Gov in the middle of running for mayor, making him look like an idiot
Dan
Feb 1st, 2010
Don’t challenge Bob Brady! Philadelphia Democrats have had it with this PA bullsh*t for too many years. We need a good fight to knock off the heads of village idiots: Doherty, Ribner, etal. These dopes are looking for a place to hide and collect money. Doherty’s (sic) base is a myth. Check the numbers and decide for yourself. Saidel will reinvent the office of Lt. Governor and get taxpayers’ the answers, access and change needed from Harrisburg. As for Danny Boy Onarato – keep meddling and you will pay the price my friend! Fat Boy Eddie has ruined the Dems chances to date. Your people out West don’t like you at all. Hasn’t jack Wagner kicked the crap out of your family for years?
Ryan
Feb 1st, 2010
Well..it seems some western capmaign staffers are disseminating their venom here. Onaorato would not be in the fight if he learned to mind his own business! He tried to be King and he certainly is not king. He meddled in the Lt. Gov. race and you can be sure that he knows now to keep his mouth shut. If he was not so delusional there would be no Hoeffel! And that crap about Doherty -who is mayor of a town that has 75,000 (generously)-is NEVER going to work. He’s a disgrace. He ran for Mayor -just to run for office. He has no understanding of state governement and how to “effectively” lead. If I were Saidel I would run for Governor. Why? He is the most intelligent candidate D or R in the Governor’s race! He has no peer.
suburban dem
Feb 1st, 2010
Wagner-Saidel would be a great ticket. Brady should put that together. That would certainly fix Governor Ed’s and Chairman Rooney’s wagon. It would also teach the turncoat Allegheny Dems a lesson.
tru dem
Feb 1st, 2010
Saidel is a joke. And an Onorato-Saidel ticket is a disaster. Onorato-Doherty is the only shot the Democrats have this Fall. And that is a long shot. How can Onorato campaign for 2 years, have all that money, and still be in a competitive race. He NEEDS help even if he won’t admit it.
GOPHAWK
Feb 1st, 2010
Onorato spent almost two million dollars on consultants and polls. Doherty spent one million on consultants and polls. Maybe this is a good pairing of big spenders. It explains what Ed Spendell likes about this ticket.
suburban dem
Feb 2nd, 2010
interesting all this spending on consultants by doherty and onerato…wonder how closely those consultants are aligned with the guv…with eddie not running this year, how are those concultants gloing to make money and be relevant going forward if eddies boys danny and chrissy are not in the game…hmmmmmmm
Alex W
Feb 2nd, 2010
Saidel is the loud, obnoxious uncle who shows up to every family party, makes you uncomfortable, and then, finally, much to your relief, leaves.
He’s certainly not a bad guy, but he would be a terrible candidate for statewide office. He is also good for at least a gaffe a month.
z b
Feb 3rd, 2010
doherty is the worst mayor scranton ever seen, the infrastructure is collapsing,the city is buried in debt, its been distressed for the entire 8 years doherty has been mayor and is worse off now, the police have resorted to buying their own vehicles, the majority of fire apparatus is 15 to 20 years old or more,the uniformed departments have not had a raise in 8 years, the cities debt increased,the budget ballooned to its highest ever, taxes have increased, he sold off city assets,crime has increased and this is a guy anyone would want to lead pennsylvania. just look at the city yourself and not the fluff pieces in the only peper in town that supports him that located out of the city themselves.
Red Pin Pete
Feb 3rd, 2010
Could someone please explain to me what Jonathan Saidel brings to the table? I mean seriously, we are going to win Philly in the general election. Surely he is not going to increase Philly turnout any more than Specter/Sestak. Maybe a few thousand votes, but not more.
I see him as a potential liability for the Democratic slate. We already know the Senate nominee will come from the southeast, but what happens if Hoeffel wins for Governor? We would have all 3 candidates from the southeast. We would get slaughtered in the southwest and Erie.
I am not sure that Doherty helps us if Hoeffel is the nominee. Is there not someone else that could add something to the ticket with the potential for devastation? Isn’t the first rule with VP/Lt Gov, do no harm? I don’t have any axe to grind against Saidel, I just don’t see what he brings to the table.
phillip
Feb 3rd, 2010
Doherty is a liability for Onorato ! Doherty cant raise enough money so he wants to slide in as lt.Doherty’s stance on abortion,he cant seem to make up his mind he is like Casey.He claims to have an economic plan.While business’s leave the city.Just 2 this week already.Doherty is a habitual LIAR,who hire crony’s with out experience thats why the city is in shambles.Bad oecd loans bad decisions one after another.
PJ
Feb 3rd, 2010
DOHERTY, IS A UNION BREAKER
cocernedcitizen
Feb 4th, 2010
Doherty is not a good mayor.He was born with the silver spoon in his mouth and has never done a real days work in his life. He was pushed into office using ties with the Lynetts and Haggertys. They control this one rag town. Doherty, should as all other elected officials, focus on his job and not be allowed to seek another office while working through his current term. Enough with these career politions. It’s time for real change.
Carole Kocher
Feb 4th, 2010
For 68 years I have been a Scranton resident and witnessed the highs and lows of my beloved city. With the loss of the coal and garment industries, we experienced a sustained economic depression. As a teacher for 33 years in the Scranton Public Schools, I watched our best and brightest exodus to more lucrative jobs in other states. For years I saw stagnation. In the past 8 years we have had a rebirth, a new energy evidenced by our new medical college,a revitalized downtown business and residential area,increased support for the arts and most importantly our young leaders are returning to and joining with pride our vibrant community. A renaissance is happening in Scranton and Mayor Chris Doherty is its leader. Carole Kocher
concernedcitizen
Feb 5th, 2010
Doherty has to run on the coattails of someone else. Without his local support and his appointed cronies, most with no experiance in the jobs they hold, he’ll never go anywhere. All you have to do is take a good hard look at Scranton, it’s going down faster than an olympic down hill skier. As far as the medical school, Doherty took credit for it, only he had very little to do with it actually coming to Scranton. He actually worked almost blew it when the original site’s price was blown way out of scale, due to his friends trying to make a fast buck. The Times is totally behind him and thats a great thing for a politician. Too bad this area only has one rag to bring us the news that they want printed. Doherty is your typical politician. When he was running for office the second time, he needed the west side vote, so the sewer authority hired 12 people from west side.
phillip
Feb 5th, 2010
Doherty had nothing to do with the medical school!He likes to say he did.He has people believing he is so great for this city,but he actually has ruined it.Oecd loans gone bad hiring of contractors.aka cronies.SSA,Spa city hall he hires unqualified people his friends.There is no re birth down town is dead business’s are leaving people open your eyes.A vibrant community lady where are you living.
Carole Kocher
Feb 5th, 2010
Sounds like some Scrantonians are missing out on some of the fun in our vibrant city. How about joining us in the parties in Nay Aug Park, various ethic festivals there and in the downtown, the Everhart Museum exibitions, First Friday art celebrations, Scranton Philharmonic, Broadway Theater League,”The Office” convention,parties downtown on the roof tops,communal community art murals,the Scranton marathon and more. The vitality of a community reponds to what you bring to it. You cannot put a gallon into a pint! Carole
phillip
Feb 9th, 2010
I enjoy Nay Aug park like the rest of Scranton and enjoy the festivals.But the Doherty facts speaks volumes,the city debt the roads hirings of cronies,drunks and addicts.They have two parties a year on the roof top and run out of beer ,wine and food.The parks animals are gone also.If you want to give him credit thats fine but look at the statistics.He is a LIAR !And is way out of his league! And drinks a little to much! Phillip