Comments on: Sestak has $5.1M on hand http://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/ Your destination for PA's Big 2012 Election Races Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:20:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: ysmgjltyuqhttp://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9765 ysmgjltyuq Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:09:32 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9765 P4ZdM2 <a href="http://cwkdvmqccvga.com/" rel="nofollow">cwkdvmqccvga</a>, [url=http://griyodrfndug.com/]griyodrfndug[/url], [link=http://urspvciyhidh.com/]urspvciyhidh[/link], http://pxtmfaerpvhp.com/ P4ZdM2 cwkdvmqccvga, [url=http://griyodrfndug.com/]griyodrfndug[/url], [link=http://urspvciyhidh.com/]urspvciyhidh[/link], http://pxtmfaerpvhp.com/

]]> By: HateSestakhttp://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9214 HateSestak Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:57:05 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9214 $5.1. million that the Democratic Party sorely needs. There are far more viable Democratic candidacies in PA at present. But of course, Representative Sestak's primary aim is to satisfy his already inflated ego - not to bolster progressive causes. $5.1. million that the Democratic Party sorely needs. There are far more viable Democratic candidacies in PA at present. But of course, Representative Sestak’s primary aim is to satisfy his already inflated ego – not to bolster progressive causes.

]]> By: David Dianohttp://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9211 David Diano Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:40:42 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9211 Dan- Do you know how much of this is available for the Primary vs the General election? Breakdown for both candidates would put more context to these numbers. Dan-
Do you know how much of this is available for the Primary vs the General election?
Breakdown for both candidates would put more context to these numbers.

]]> By: Weekend roundup: Battleground Illinoishttp://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9186 Weekend roundup: Battleground Illinois Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:30:32 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9186 [...] Sestak raises $650K, has impressive $5.1 million on hand. [...] [...] Sestak raises $650K, has impressive $5.1 million on hand. [...]

]]> By: Dan Hirschhornhttp://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9167 Dan Hirschhorn Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:10:14 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9167 Hey WiseOne,As editor of pa2010.com, I can personally assure you that no such comment was deleted. I looked back at our comment database and didn't see it. But we've been having a few glitches here and there, and you're not the first person to encounter this problem.Nonetheless, my sincerest apologies that it didn't post.Open dialogue is critical to us. If you're ever having trouble getting a comment through, please feel free to e-mail me the body of it at editor@pa2010.com. I'll be happy to make sure it gets online.Sorry again.Dan Hirschhorn Hey WiseOne,

As editor of pa2010.com, I can personally assure you that no such comment was deleted. I looked back at our comment database and didn’t see it. But we’ve been having a few glitches here and there, and you’re not the first person to encounter this problem.

Nonetheless, my sincerest apologies that it didn’t post.

Open dialogue is critical to us. If you’re ever having trouble getting a comment through, please feel free to e-mail me the body of it at editor@pa2010.com. I’ll be happy to make sure it gets online.

Sorry again.

Dan Hirschhorn

]]> By: WiseOnehttp://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9148 WiseOne Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:54:19 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9148 THE GATEKEEPERS OF THIS WEB SITE DELETED MY COMMENTS ABOUT SPECTER AND TOOMEY VOTING TO REPEAL THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT IN 1999, AN ACTION THAT RUINED OUR BANKING SYSTEM. WHY IS PA2010.C0M AN UNDEMOCRATIC SITE? WHO CONTROLS IT? LET’S HEAR FROM DIANO AND OTHERS ON THIS. THE GATEKEEPERS OF THIS WEB SITE DELETED MY COMMENTS ABOUT SPECTER AND TOOMEY VOTING TO REPEAL THE GLASS STEAGALL ACT IN 1999, AN ACTION THAT RUINED OUR BANKING SYSTEM. WHY IS PA2010.C0M AN UNDEMOCRATIC SITE? WHO CONTROLS IT? LET’S HEAR FROM DIANO AND OTHERS ON THIS.

]]> By: David Dianohttp://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9145 David Diano Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:19:42 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9145 What's wrong with this statement?..... "For his primary challenge, the aide said, Sestak now has more cash than 1992 Democratic candidate Lynn Yeakel."1) No correction for inflation.2) No correction for changes to campaign finance limits.3) No correction for population (ie. number of voters/donors available)4) No correction for the political makeup of the electorate.5) No indication what point in Yeakel campaign this is.6) No valid analogy since a) Lynn Yeakel faced Specter in a General election, not a Democratic primary. b) Lynn Yeakel had never held public office c) Lynn Yeakel has one more X-chromosome than Sestak.7) Does Sestak also has more money than Specter did in 1992?Whenever I read statements from Sestak's aides, I'm reminded of the expression: dumb as a box of rocks. What’s wrong with this statement?…..
“For his primary challenge, the aide said, Sestak now has more cash than 1992 Democratic candidate Lynn Yeakel.”

1) No correction for inflation.

2) No correction for changes to campaign finance limits.

3) No correction for population (ie. number of voters/donors available)

4) No correction for the political makeup of the electorate.

5) No indication what point in Yeakel campaign this is.

6) No valid analogy since
a) Lynn Yeakel faced Specter in a General election, not a Democratic primary.
b) Lynn Yeakel had never held public office
c) Lynn Yeakel has one more X-chromosome than Sestak.

7) Does Sestak also has more money than Specter did in 1992?

Whenever I read statements from Sestak’s aides, I’m reminded of the expression: dumb as a box of rocks.

]]> By: STEELBLITZ1http://www.pa2012.com/2010/01/sestak-has-5-1m-on-hand/comment-page-1/#comment-9140 STEELBLITZ1 Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:50:06 +0000 http://www.pa2010.com/?p=5772#comment-9140 Joe being tight with a buck? I guess thats why he reserved the IBEW Hall and then cancelled on them to save the money.We're going to find out in his expenditures. I also have been hearing he spends alot on his relatives. I guess were going to find out if hes been "tight w the buck" on them like he has been other staffers. Joe being tight with a buck? I guess thats why he reserved the IBEW Hall and then cancelled on them to save the money.

We’re going to find out in his expenditures. I also have been hearing he spends alot on his relatives. I guess were going to find out if hes been “tight w the buck” on them like he has been other staffers.

]]>