send to a friend | print | comment
A Dem insider on Mass. race
Here’s one of our readers, knowledgeable Democratic insider E.M., on the results of Tuesday’s Senate race in Massachusetts:
What does Massachusetts election mean for November?
Just about everybody in politics has an opinion of what happened in the Massachusetts special election for US Senate yesterday. Here’s mine.
Two bedrock principles of political campaigning are in play here.
The first fundamental is “Never take an opponent or a campaign for granted.” Martha Coakley and her campaign operatives in Washington and Boston took Sen-elect Scott Brown for granted.
She let up after her primary election win, sat on a lead, and evidently, didn’t adequately poll to catch the shift in the race. Basically, she was caught flatfooted. Thus, the outcome.
But what does this mean for the mid-term elections in November? That’s where the other political principle comes in play.
That theory goes: “A week is a lifetime in politics.” Anybody who tells you today they know what this portends for the 2010 election is merely speculating, or probably, guessing.
Nobody was predicting a mere month ago that Brown would win.
There are many weeks, or lifetimes, in the 10 months before the general election. Many things will change. That’s all I predict today. I wouldn’t pretend to know now how things will play out.
Stay tuned.
January 20, 2010 at 4:15 pm













Ed H.
Jan 20th, 2010
E.M. is totally correct. Patrick Murphy came out of nowhere to beat a relatively popular congressman in 2006 because he outworked Michael Fitzpatrick. John Perzel’s longevity (legal problems aside) has come from the fact that when he’s ahead in polling against opponents, he still goes out and knocks on doors in the neaighborhoods he reprsents. Coakley’s campaign was terrible because she assumed that the seat was hers for the taking. She now knows what Rich Costello found out the hard way in his loss to Perzel… that sitting back and expecting a win doesn;t get you a win.
Greg K., PA
Jan 21st, 2010
I think this sums things up pretty well – the people who were predicting the end of the GOP after 2008 are just as ridiculous and short-sighted as those who are predicting an upset in November.
Policies take time to take effect, there are lagging economic indicators in play (notably Unemployment), and we can’t really say for sure how any of this will play out until Election Day.