send to a friend | print | comment
Lentz or Vitali? The question exposes a DelCo divide (Updated)
Ever since Congressman Joe Sestak (D-7) began signaling that he’d leave his House seat open in favor of a Senate run, Delaware County Democrats have been determined to hold onto a district it took them almost 20 years to win back. To that end, many have rallied around state Representative Bryan Lentz as the best candidate. But it seems that just as many have been prodding state Representative Greg Vitali to enter the race. And in the behind-the-scenes jockeying leading up to next year’s primary, a rift has emerged among county Democrats over who should be defending the seat.
The divide, which played out in interviews with numerous party insiders, in many ways mirrors conflicts that are all too familiar for the party. It has pitted contingents of Democrats from Media and Swarthmore against those from Haverford, Radnor and other areas. It has seen insiders who supported Sestak over Lentz in 2006 once again seeking an alternative candidate, this time in Vitali. And it has brought latent resentment of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s role in local politics back to the forefront.
But it has also played out against the backdrop of a looming party leadership battle, and has sometimes even cut across ideological lines within the party. And with Republicans appearing to settle on a strong candidate early in one of the most competitive House races in the country, it has the potential to make Democratic efforts to hold the seat all the more difficult.
“They’re both good men, but I don’t want to see a fight,” said Peter Jesson, the Chadds Ford party chairman who is supporting Lentz. “They’re going to burn up a lot of energy.
“It would give an enormous advantage to the Republicans if treasure and energy were spent on a contentious primary,” he added.
Lentz supporters see the two-term state lawmaker as an energetic campaigner whose military background will prove politically potent, and they have tried to discourage Vitali from jumping in, some more directly than others. But proponents of Vitali see a longtime community leader who has repeatedly won in a Republican-leaning state House district. One of Vitali’s biggest supporters, party treasurer Paul Scoles, e-mailed party members in August, asking them to “flood” Vitali’s mailbox “with messages encouraging him to declare his candidacy.”
“We need Greg in Congress,” Scoles wrote in the e-mail obtained by pa2010.com. “We need his brains, his passion on environmental issues, his dedication to working hard for his constituents, his integrity, and above all his calm but steady independence.”
The divide emerged long before political consultant E. Teresa Touey announced her candidacy this week. Lentz is definitely running and Vitali won’t make a final decision until after next month’s general election. But with the viability of Touey’s candidacy still unknown, Lentz, Vitali and party leaders all seemed to agree in interviews that it will be vital for any party primary to be conducted in a way that doesn’t harm the eventual nominee’s chances in a general election.
“I think it’s up to everbody to make sure that if we do have a primary, we treat everyone with respect,” said Anthony Campisi, a party vice-chair.
Signaling that he would take just that tone if he eventually runs, Vitali said: “I really am very conscious of trying to make sure that this is not personal. I want to stay 100 percent positive.”
But the disagreements are real, and while far from vitriolic, they run deep in the county party’s political culture. If they can be traced to a recent starting point, it would probably be in early 2006, when Sestak returned to the district to run for Congress. The DCCC had largely settled on Lentz, while some local insiders were behind Scoles. When Scoles bowed out and backed Sestak, Gov. Ed Rendell eventually prodded Lentz out of the race. Ever since, there have been raw feelings among Lentz supporters, and just as raw feelings among Sestak supporters who didn’t want the DCCC picking their candidate.
“I think that’s playing out today to a considerable extent,” Scoles said in an interview. “There were a lot of people who wanted Lentz [in 2006].
Vitali met with the DCCC in August and has been quiet since, Scoles said, only fueling the perception that the committee is trying to keep him out. The DCCC publicly maintains neutrality in most primaries.
“We haven’t heard a word from him since,” Scoles said. “I suspect someone there squelched him.”
In Campisi’s view, any dissatisfaction from 2006 was fueled by the fact that the seat finally seemed winnable for Democrats for the first time in years—and remains that way today.
“People who wanted to run all these years and didn’t feel they could win now think they can run,” he said. But, he said, “anyone who was unhappy about Bryan stepping aisde in 2006 should call the governor. He’s the one who called up Bryan. No one in Delaware County had anything to do with that.”
The X-factor at play is a party leadership fight looming next year. Shortly after the primary, party chairman Cliff Wilson will step aside. Many see Campisi as being groomed as a successor. And both leaders are staying decidedly neutral on the Lentz-Vitali question, wary of alienating supporters of either candidate. Sestak, for his part, also seems to be staying out of it so far.
But the most important question may be whether a primary is a good or bad thing for the party. Lentz supporters want the party to coalesce around him.
“The worst nightmare for me is to have more than one person running,” said Jesson, the Chadds Ford chair. “It’s not going to be an easy race for the Democrats, and the more we can work as a team, the better off we’ll be.”
Vitali supporters think a primary will help whoever eventually wins.
“I think a contested primaries are a good thing,” Scoles said. “They draw attention to candidates. I would like to see this turn into a primary where we could debate some serious issues.”
And if party leaders are leaning in any direction, it’s toward letting whoever wants to run get in the race. Wilson sent just that signal in attending Touey’s announcement in Drexel Hill on Monday.
“There are people like myself who think a primary can energize the party,” he said then. “We’re an open party. I’d like to see a good primary that involves the voters.”
Regardless, Campisi is confident the party will be ready next November to take on former U.S. Attorney Pat Meehan, the likely GOP nominee.
“If your question is will [a primary] impact our ability to keep the seat,” he said, “my answer is no.”
October 1, 2009 at 7:00 am
Tags: Anthony Campisi, Bryan Lentz, Cliff Wilson, DCCC, Delaware County, E. Teresa Touey, Greg Vitali, Joe Sestak, PA-7, Pat Meehan, Paul Scoles, Peter Jesson













Lentz or Vitali? The question exposes a DelCo divide… | GrassrootsPA
Oct 1st, 2009
[...] Lentz or Vitali? The question exposes a DelCo divide… [...]
TheMortonMagician
Oct 1st, 2009
This is a story in search of an issue. From an insiders perspective, I really don’t see a “divide” of any consequence, but rather the normal give-and take of politics. My point is made in the story itself. It recalls the potential primary fight for the 2006 Democratic Nomination in the 7th Congressional District. Look at how that played out. Delaware County ended up a new Democratic Congressman in Joe Sestak and a new Democratic State Representative in Bryan Lentz, both with stellar qualifications.
My name is on the endorsement list that Bryan Lentz released today because I believe he has the combination of dedication to local issues and real-world understanding of international issues, gained through his extensive Military experience as an office of the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division. But my support is also based on the fact that Lentz graciously stepped aside in the 2006 race in favor of Sestak’s equally compelling resume. He went on to run a very tough and successful race against an entrenched 30 year machine incumbent, and has been done a great deal of work for his constituents both locally and in Harrisburg in the three years since, despite the unimaginable tragedy of the loss of his young son. But please don’t mistake my support for sympathy. It is in recognition that Lentz will be an excellent successor to Congressman Sestak, both in character and qualifications.
Sincerely,
Mario Cimino
D – Morton Borough Council
David Diano
Oct 1st, 2009
A little insider perspective:
1) Lentz and Vitali would both be great congressmen and are easily superior to Sestak in character.
2) It’s no secret that Delco Dems have the Cliff Wilson crowd and the anti-Cliff Wilson crowd.
3) I recognize many in the anti-Cliff crowd among Lentz’s supporters. Bruce Bikin ran against Cliff in 2006, and lost by about 3 votes in a bitter contest. I won’t bother singling out anyone else, but there are a few for whom it’s like the Hatfields and McCoys.
4) Besides Lentz being a great candidate, there is the obvious/transparent attempt by some to latch onto Lentz and use that to leverage the Delco Dem Chairmanship in 2010. An endorsement by Sestak or the winner of the 2010 primary could easily tip the scales in a close race.
5) Expect to see a lot of a$$ kissing next spring.
Scott Alberts
Oct 1st, 2009
Some more insider perspective…
Lentz and Vitali have a friendly relationship and aren’t interested in an ugly primary battle, regardless of the agendas that some supporters on either side might have. Lentz is pursuing an opportunity to further the agenda that called him into public service, and Vitali is considering pursuing the same opportunity.
Greg is focused on some legislative priorities at the moment and has yet to make a decision. Those of you who are familiar with HB 80 and the discussions about the Marcellus Shale can imagine where his attention has been. Nobody has “squelched” him. He is seriously considering entering the race, but will or will not do so on his own terms and for his own reasons.
Anyone familiar with the way Greg conducts his business and his campaigns is probably smiling at the thought of Greg being talked out of anything he has set his mind on or at the image of Greg as the champion of the committee establishment. At this moment, I can promise you that the only person who know’s Greg Vitali’s intentions is Greg Vitali.
PA Dem 87
Oct 1st, 2009
I have heard many of you asking questions about Sam Thomas–asking for more information. Hope this helps:
Sam Thomas
n.
1. Political wunderkind
2. The Rahm Emmanuel of Delaware County Politics
A political operative of extreme talent or ability who achieves great success or acclaim at an early age.
[Hebrew : political prodigy]
David Diano
Oct 1st, 2009
Scott-
No disagreement. I was actually impressed with how genuinely cordial Lentz and Vitali were with each other at Labor Day event.
PA Dem 87-
1) Political Dunder-kid
2) I didn’t realize he was foul-mouthed.
EV
Oct 2nd, 2009
Is Thomas planning to run against Vitali, or only running if it’s a vacant seat? I still haven’t seen this reported anywhere except here?
David Diano
Oct 3rd, 2009
Thomas run against Vitali? LOL!
In an open primary race, he’ll get CRUSHED by Prince Valiant. Heck, he’ll get crushed by anyone’s who’s a committee member (note: he’s not even a committee member)
Besides, to run in the 2010 primary, he’d have to leave the Sestak campaign to work on his own and do his own fundraising.
Sestak isn’t going to like losing a resource, especially if Thomas takes some of his young, underpaid friends with him. Expect Sestak to “talk him out of it” for the good of xxxxx (ie Sestak).
5th ward
Oct 3rd, 2009
I saw a mention of it on Haverford blog
Scott Alberts
Oct 5th, 2009
EV & David,
Sam Thomas has told me that he has no plans to run for anything at the moment and has no idea who started this rumor.