<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Conservative group says it&#8217;s contacted 6,000 Specter donors</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pa2012.com/2009/10/conservative-group-says-its-contacted-6000-specter-donors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2009/10/conservative-group-says-its-contacted-6000-specter-donors/</link> <description>Your destination for PA&#039;s Big 2012 Election Races</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:20:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Matt Silva</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2009/10/conservative-group-says-its-contacted-6000-specter-donors/comment-page-1/#comment-4361</link> <dc:creator>Matt Silva</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:42:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=4454#comment-4361</guid> <description>What is Petty is when Specter criticized Joe for not voting in Primary elections as an independent.  When you donate money to a Democrat, you would kind of like to think that the money doesn&#039;t immediately go to a Republican.  I don&#039;t see how this helps Specter, if he switched parties without having the money on hand to return, it shows his switch to be what it is, a last ditch effort to stay in office.  It is irresponsible, and I don&#039;t see any really stellar reason why Joe wouldn&#039;t make issue about it.  Joe has a lot of ground to gain, so I don&#039;t see much point in holding back anything.
As far as Joe duping any one, did his announcing his bid for Senate a big surprise?  Obviously he still had a bit of a war chest left after his hard fought (yawn) battle with Craig Williams, but it was not the surprise decision of the decade like Specter&#039;s switch was.  Dave, maybe you should contact the voters who donated to Sestak and see how many want their money back.
One final note, what does anyone know about Bill Kortz?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is Petty is when Specter criticized Joe for not voting in Primary elections as an independent.  When you donate money to a Democrat, you would kind of like to think that the money doesn&#8217;t immediately go to a Republican.  I don&#8217;t see how this helps Specter, if he switched parties without having the money on hand to return, it shows his switch to be what it is, a last ditch effort to stay in office.  It is irresponsible, and I don&#8217;t see any really stellar reason why Joe wouldn&#8217;t make issue about it.  Joe has a lot of ground to gain, so I don&#8217;t see much point in holding back anything.<br
/> As far as Joe duping any one, did his announcing his bid for Senate a big surprise?  Obviously he still had a bit of a war chest left after his hard fought (yawn) battle with Craig Williams, but it was not the surprise decision of the decade like Specter&#8217;s switch was.  Dave, maybe you should contact the voters who donated to Sestak and see how many want their money back.<br
/> One final note, what does anyone know about Bill Kortz?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg Kauffman</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2009/10/conservative-group-says-its-contacted-6000-specter-donors/comment-page-1/#comment-4341</link> <dc:creator>Greg Kauffman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:00:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=4454#comment-4341</guid> <description>I think this can only help Sen. Specter.  He still has a comfortable war chest.  Rep. Sestak is being a little petty here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this can only help Sen. Specter.  He still has a comfortable war chest.  Rep. Sestak is being a little petty here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Diano</title><link>http://www.pa2012.com/2009/10/conservative-group-says-its-contacted-6000-specter-donors/comment-page-1/#comment-4304</link> <dc:creator>David Diano</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:44:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pa2010.com/?p=4454#comment-4304</guid> <description>What f*&amp;^ing gall for Sestak to criticize Specter for being honorable enough to return money to anybody that felt the money wasn&#039;t going to be used as intended.WHEN IS SESTAK GOING TO MAKE THE SAME OFFER TO THE SUPPORTERS WHO DONATED MONEY FOR A 7TH DISTRICT RACE THAT HE DUPED???</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What f*&amp;^ing gall for Sestak to criticize Specter for being honorable enough to return money to anybody that felt the money wasn&#8217;t going to be used as intended.</p><p>WHEN IS SESTAK GOING TO MAKE THE SAME OFFER TO THE SUPPORTERS WHO DONATED MONEY FOR A 7TH DISTRICT RACE THAT HE DUPED???</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 438/439 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.pa2012.com @ 2012-02-12 03:12:49 -->
