Adam Schwartzbaum's Blog
Adam Schwartzbaum's Blog
The In-Specter
send to a friend | print | comment
It’s not too late for Democrats
It’s been a rough summer for Democrats in Washington; even President Obama’s poll numbers are feeling the heat. Voters are irritated by a prolonged recession and by intractable squabbling in Washington. Populist anger over the lack of progress is likely a contributing factor to polls like the one released yesterday, showing Pat Toomey in a statistical dead heat with Arlen Specter in the Senate race. At this point, people are angry with anyone in Washington, with a throw-the-bums-out mood gripping a significant chunk of the electorate. This is a feeling that extends to elected officials in both parties, but as the party in power, Democrats are singled out for the pinch.
Yet not all is lost for the Democratic Party. There is a lot of time between now and Election Day 2010. Partisans on the right are already
talking about Obama’s Waterloo with health care, yet the fact remains that there is still time for the President to pass his ambitious
agenda for change before the end of 2009. The popularity of Obama, and Democrats like Specter more generally, will depend on primarily on how the economy performs, and secondly on how they perform in Washington in passing reforms in health care, energy, and new financial regulations. If the stimulus plan fails to pick up steam in the next six months, and Democrats are not able to pass the major parts of Obama’s platform before year’s end, they will be in an exposed and ever more vulnerable position in elections across the
country.
But if the economy improves, and Democrats are able to deliver on the President’s campaign promises, I believe you will see
Democrats withstanding and perhaps even growing stronger in the 2010 elections. While polls showing conservatives like Toomey gaining on people like Specter, its easy for Democrats to start getting hysterical about losing Elections. These numbers should make every Democratic elected official put their nose to the grindstone, and work even harder to ensure the mandate the American people gave them in November to make historic change in this country is not squandered.
July 23, 2009 at 11:31 am













Jonathan Geeting
Jul 23rd, 2009
I think that analysis ignores some important factors. For one, only 44% of voters know enough about Toomey to have an opinion of him. His record in the House was ultraconservative, and it will be easy to show that the philosophy he subscribes to on the economy is the same or worse than the one that guided Bush. He can easily be portrayed as another far right winger like Rick Santorum who will embarass the state. Furthermore, if the Democrats fail to pass Obama’s agenda, it will be because the power of conservatives in both parties in the Senate has been far too strong. That is an argument for sending more progressive Democrats to the Senate to overtake not just Republicans but the conservative bloc in their own party. It’s people like Evan Bayh, Joe Lieberman, and Ben Nelson who are holding Obama’s agenda back. While conservatives will try to frame the problem as liberal overreach, it will be easy to make the case to voters that more, not less, progressives are needed.
David Diano
Jul 23rd, 2009
Jonathan-
Some of the conservative Dems are the problem. They have been able to use the Republicans as excuses for failed progressive legislation, but now that some could actually pass, these Blue Dogs are crapping on the sidewalk.
Toomey does better against Sestak, because Sestak has to spend money to define himself AND make the case that Toomey is ultra-conservative. This takes a lot of time and money. Sestak’s spending money trying to convince people that Specter is too conservative (survey says… ain’t gonna happen).
If the economy goes south, even a guy like Toomey can win against an unknown/risk like Sestak. Specter is a known quantity, who has weathered good times and bad, and can point to something he’s done in every previous recovery.
If the economy improves (stock market and housing sales up this week), Specter is a “hero” for sticking by Obama.
Specter’s proving himself to the left of Casey with that gun vote.
Lee Levan
Jul 23rd, 2009
Jonathan
I agree with your reasoning. Either Sestak or Specter will beat Toomey. Personally, I believe that Sestak will have an easier time doing so.