The Washington Post

pa2012.com is proud to partner with The Washington Post in bringing our originally reported insider political news to a wide audience of decision makers and opinion leaders across the country.

Close it

The arguments about EFCA are wrong—time to pass the bill

by Patricia O'Malley

The Employee Free Choice Act is a bipartisan proposal to improve the union-organizing process and protect workers’ union rights. Senator Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Congressman George Miller (D-Calif.) recently reintroduced the bill to Congress. Originally presented in 2007, it passed the House but stopped in the Senate at the end of the 110th Congress.

Now, the 111th Congress will consider the bill.

EFCA is controversial and hotly debated. Labor unions and advocates strongly favor it. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and most corporations oppose it. The public relations battle has long since begun with TV news programs, advertisements—and a lot of confusion. It amends the National Labor Relations Act by expanding and protecting workers’ rights to form unions.

Current law allows employers to decide how their employees will form their union. That choice is between a secret ballot and a consent card system. Almost all employers demand a secret ballot because the law allows them to hold mandatory “education” sessions where they can threaten and intimidate the employees into voting against the union. Those rules don’t apply under “card check,” as the bill has become widely known. And even when the employees do choose a union, the employer does not have to negotiate with that union for a contract. Employers regularly violate the few laws that protect the workers and they get away with it.

The Employee Free Choice Act allows workers to form a union without being fired. It takes the choice between a secret ballot election and a card-check system away from the employer and gives it to the employees. It guarantees workers a contract when they do form a union. And it increases penalties against companies that break the law. That’s all there is to it. You can read it yourself here. Just insert bill number HR 1409.

The Chamber of Commerce is the chief opponent. It claims the bill would outlaw a secret ballot. It claims the federal government would dictate work rules and pay.

These statements are absolute, outright, LIES. The legislation does not remove the secret ballot. The government would not control union contracts. Union-busting organizations have raised more than $130 million to defeat EFCA. Now, surely they wouldn’t do that unless they knew that they would make far more money by eliminating unions. According to the AFL-CIO, Citigroup and Bank of America have used your tax dollars from their government bailouts to lobby Congress to deprive you of your right to form a union.

Capitalism is based on selfishness and exploitation. According to classical economists, Labor—that’s you and me—is a product to be bought and sold and treated no better than the furniture. Without regulations and unions, we are all slaves with paychecks. Yet business owners claim the unlimited right to help themselves by forming business associations, chambers of commerce, cartels and other joint ventures.

Most capitalists have obstructed every effort to treat workers like human beings—the eight-hour day, the five-day week, the minimum wage, wage and hour laws, paid overtime, restrictions on child labor, fair hiring practices, health and safety regulations, social security, equal pay, family and medical leave, unemployment compensation, workers’ compensation, sexual harassment regulations, environmental regulations and countless others.

They were wrong on those issues, and they’re wrong about EFCA.

Workers have all of those protections because of the unions. If you happen to have paid vacations, sick days, holidays, pensions, health insurance, personnel policies, a grievance procedure and lots more… THANK A UNION. You would have none of it without that union. Not a single union contract ever prevented an employer from firing an incompetent employee. All union contracts contain a fair disciplinary process so that you can’t be fired for improper reasons.

Labor unions created the American middle class. When union membership rises, everyone’s pay and working conditions improve. They’re the folks who brought you the weekend. And they’re the only ones who have always looked out for your best interests, whether you’re a member or not.

While EFCA winds its way through the system, the corporate forces are already swamping Congress with letters, calls, messages and visits from the people who don’t want you to have any rights at work. But we can all help to get the Employee Free Choice Act passed. Call, write and e-mail Senators Arlen Specter and Bob Casey. Remind them that you deserve the same rights that your employer has.

The writer is a consultant to nonprofits and a freelance writer in Pittsburgh. This article originally appeared in 51 Corridor.

share001btn The arguments about EFCA are wrong—time to pass the bill

June 18, 2009 at 10:30 am

--Patricia O'Malley

comments

comments [6] | post a comment

  1. Delco Dandy

    Jun 18th, 2009

    As a Republican, you outline the case for EFCA more comprehensively than most.

    However, you still openly admit that this bill would take the choice b/w secret ballot and “card consent” away from the employer and given to the employees. What is their process for choosing which to use? It seems to me that reform is necessary as employers are given a lot of leeway to intimidate. But doesn’t this just give union organizers the power to do so instead? Can’t we find a middle ground whereby a free and fair election can take place whereby both sides get a chance to openly advocate for and against union formation?

    Taken away a bad practice on one side and handing it over to the other and saying that you’ve found the solution to the problem is naive at best. Think outside the box, not in good cop, bad cop terms, and move forward w/ a better, more concise solution.

  2. Delco Dandy

    Jun 18th, 2009

    That is until the “i hate capitalism” part. But the first two paragraphs more importantly.

  3. Tammy Alonso

    Jun 18th, 2009

    So, Delco Dandy, you’d like employers to have a say in whether or not their employees form a union. Really? And where, exactly, are the employees’ voices in employer decisions such as those involving layoffs, plant closings, decisions to enter into or form the associations, ventures, and cartels mentioned by Ms. O’Malley?

    Unless you also support workers’ voices being added to those decision-making processes, you are proving the point that Ms. O’Malley makes about capitalism being based on the selfishness of owners and the exploitation of workers and proving yourself to be a proponent of an unfair system.

    (Thanks, though, to Patricia O’Malley for not only covering this issue which I, myself, have devoted much space to on my Left of Centre blog here on this site, but also for adding some much needed balance from both the Western side of the state and the working people’s perspective.)

  4. Delco Dandy

    Jun 18th, 2009

    I’m saying employers should have a voice in the process and articulate the downside to union formation. It should be like any other election, both sides make their case and the employees vote on it.

    Right now, I understand that the employees are hamstrung in making their case and I think that is wrong. But don’t turn this debate on its head and make the same mistakes on the flip side and make it a union handout.

    Find a middle ground…………..

  5. Tammy Alonso

    Jun 18th, 2009

    You’ve totally ignored my point, perhaps intentionally.

    My point is that, since employees have no say in the decisions made by and for their employers, neither should employers have a say in decisions made by and for employees.

    There are always employees who are against forming a union in any workplace and that should be the genesis for the argument against unionizing.

    Employers can make decisions that affect them without employee input. Employees should be able to do the same for themselves without employer involvement.

  6. Delco Dandy

    Jun 21st, 2009

    Well that’s not 100% totally accurate. Employers often consult and cede authority to employees for various aspects of a business’ functionality.

    Now that authority may not be ultimate but they do give the employer say in the day to day operations in most cases.

    Conversely, the folks who own/run businesses should have a say in the discussion leading up to union formation after all, they own/run said business.

    There’s a middle ground people are missing here. It’s not so black and white.

Leave a Reply


- will not be published